Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Password:(required)

Join Us

Your Name:(required)

Your Email:(required)

Your Message :

0/2000

Everything You Need To Know To Find The Best Praziquantel Ep Standard

Author: Elva

Jun. 05, 2025

13 0

Repeated versus single praziquantel dosing regimen in treatment of ...

Introduction

Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) refers to the overall gynaecological manifestation of Schistosoma-parasitic flatworm infection, predominantly transmitted by the Schistosoma haematobium species (1). FGS has a high prevalence across sub-Saharan Africa, affecting an estimated 80 million African girls and women (1).

If you want to learn more, please visit our website Jiayi Pharmaceutical.

Females are infected with S. haematobium through contact with parasite-infested freshwater. In their free-swimming stage, the cercariae penetrate the skin and transform into schistosomula, subsequently maturing into schistosomes in the liver. Male and female schistosomes form pairs and migrate to the bladder and the genital organs, where egg excretion commences (2). The pathogenesis of FGS is assumed to be the result of a complex inflammatory immune response driven by antigens released from viable eggs secreted by the adult female worms and subsequently entrapped in urogenital tissue (3). Inflammation occurs in all strata of the genital tissue, including the small blood vessels (4–7). The inflammation extends beyond the site where eggs are deposited (7–10). FGS manifests through persistent long-term effects arising from the entrapment of eggs in the genital tissues leading to chronic inflammation and subsequent fibrotic calcified lesions (11, 12).

Women with FGS commonly report urogenital symptoms such as lower abdominal pain, vaginal discharge, and postcoital bleeding (13, 14). Using a colposcope, FGS is identifiable during pelvic exam by noting distinctive cervicovaginal lesions such as grainy sandy patches, homogenous yellow sandy patches, rubbery papules, and abnormal blood vessels (14, 15). The diagnosis is further supported by friable mucosal surfaces, spontaneous bleeding, and bleeding upon instrumental contact, in addition to tenderness reported by the women undergoing pelvic exam. Various Schistosoma biomarkers in serum, urine, and cervicovaginal samples likewise support FGS diagnosis. Unfortunately, these biomarkers are challenged by low sensitivity and specificity in relation to FGS and moreover by high resource and cost prerequisites (16). However, they have proven valuable in assessing overall Schistosoma disease comprehensively, encompassing bladder and gut conditions.

Praziquantel (PZQ), a widely used anthelmintic drug, has shown remarkable effectiveness in decreasing gross pathology related to urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis in major control programmes (17). However, its efficacy in treating FGS-associated cervicovaginal lesions appears to be somewhat limited (15). Its mode of action primarily targets the muscles of the worm, causing paralysis and detachment from blood vessels (18). The lesions appear refractory to treatment despite a relatively successful anti-helminthic treatment with PZQ to eliminate the majority of the dwelling adult worm population (11). This points to a compelling need to optimise PZQ treatment regimens specifically for women with FGS. A repeated treatment schedule may thus offer a means of optimising the effect of PZQ by killing a higher proportion of the adult worm population, leading to significant decreased deposition of eggs to the genital tissue. Such a deceleration of the inflammatory process may create a conducive environment for a gradual healing of the genital pathology. Based on this rationale, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of a repeated PZQ treatment regimen compared to the standardised single-dose PZQ regimen in women with FGS.

Methods

Primary and secondary study outcomes

The primary efficacy outcome of the RCT was changes in FGS-associated cervical lesions at the end of the trial. The secondary outcomes were effects on pelvic exam abnormalities and urogenital complaints, in addition to changes in Schistosoma biomarkers.

Study area and participants

The RCT was conducted in the Ambanja district of northwestern Madagascar, known as a hyper-endemic region for S. haematobium but with low endemicity for S. mansoni (19). The dominant ethnic group and the primary spoken dialect of the Malagasy language in this district is Sakalava. Women living in the Antsakoamanondro and Antranokarany village areas were invited to attend the local health clinic for screening and inclusion in the RCT.

The calculation of the participant sample size assumed a 33% difference at Week 15-follow-up in comparison to baseline of cervical lesions in women receiving a single PZQ dose for treatment of FGS (Arm A) versus women receiving a repeated PZQ dosing regimen (Arm B). Hence, 47 women per arm were needed to identify a significant difference between the repeated treatment group and the standard treatment (significance 0.05; power of the test 0.90). Taking into consideration a loss of 20% during follow-up, 58 women were planned for enrolment in each arm.

The inclusion criteria for participation in the RCT were age 15 to 35, current urogenital complaints, and the presence of at least one of the four cervical lesion types considered pathognomonic for the detection of FGS during pelvic exam: grainy sandy patches, homogenous yellow sandy patches, rubbery papules, or abnormal blood vessels (20–23). The exclusion criteria comprised virginity, pregnancy, a history of vulva, vagina, or uterus tumours, hysterectomy, HIV-positive status, medical conditions necessitating hospitalisation, PZQ treatment in the preceding three months, or presented contraindications to PZQ. The evaluation of exclusion criteria was conducted through a meticulous interview on medical history. Participation in the screening procedure and the RCT required signed consent following comprehensive oral information concerning the study. The RCT protocol comprised a medical interview, a gynaecological exam, and the collection of various specimens of bacteria, etc. followed by PZQ treatment at baseline. The clinical assessments were repeated at Week 5-, Week 10-, and Week 15-follow-ups for both treatment arms, as documented Table 1.

Table 1

Rationale for repeated treatment with praziquantel

The immunology of schistosomiasis is characterised by an imbalance of T-cell subpopulations combined with strong polyclonal activation of B-cells, eventually leading to an altered immune response to TH1- and TH2-dependent cytokines (24–26). The evidence shows that the clinical pathology seen at the cervix in women with FGS is a result of chronic inflammation caused by antigens released by adult worms and viable eggs. Treatment with PZQ of patients with intestinal or hepatosplenic schistosomiasis has shown normalisation in the pattern of TH1- and TH2-dependent cytokines before regression of morbidity (25, 26). This indicates that the elimination of all worms by treatment with praziquantel can re-establish normal immune responsiveness.

We therefore decided to evaluate a repeated treatment with PZQ administered at well-defined time intervals, with the first dose given at baseline, the second and third doses with an interval of 12 hours, the fourth dose at Week 5, followed by the fifth dose at Week 10.

This dosage regimen was based on the following assumptions:

— A single dose of 40 mg/kg eliminates approximately 90% of adult worms; three doses of 40mg/kg were thus considered necessary to eradicate all worms at baseline (12, 27–29).

— Schistosomulae exhibit resistance to PZQ. The fourth dose is consequently administered five weeks (Week 5) after the first to eliminate any adult worms developed from schistosomulae during this time, typically taking four to six weeks (30–32).

— Anticipating reinfection a few weeks following baseline treatment, given that women continue to be exposed to infested water (33). To eradicate remaining adult worms (32), a fifth dose was administered at Week 10.

Praziquantel treatment regimens and randomisation

A single-dose weight-based (40 mg/kg) PZQ regimen at baseline (Arm A) was compared with a regimen offering an initial single dose of PZQ and repeated at 12 hours, 24 hours, at Week 5, and at Week 10 (Arm B). The design of the two treatment arms was otherwise identical, with equal numbers of participants. The R software program (Version 3.6.0) generated a randomisation list of 120 distinct participant IDs without blocking. Sealed envelopes with a participant’s unique ID and their assigned treatment arm were subsequently prepared. The IDs were consecutively allocated to the participants, after which the corresponding envelope was opened to reveal their designated treatment arm. Neither the research team nor the participants were blinded regarding the allocated treatment.

After completion of the clinical assessment protocol at baseline and follow-up, the participants were treated with PZQ according to their randomisation status. Each woman received a meal one hour before PZQ administration. In both treatment arms the women remained at the clinic where they were closely observed for 30 hours following the administration of the initial dosages at baseline. This vigilance aimed to ensure their safety and to monitor adverse events, particularly considering the repeated doses in Arm B. If pregnancy or breastfeeding occurred in any follow-up visits, PZQ was not administrated to the woman. Nonattendance likewise led to exclusion. At each visit, the women underwent pregnancy testing through a urine-based pregnancy test. At the final visit, participants from both study arms were treated with a standard PZQ dosage of 40mg/kg, administered if signs of FGS persisted, including positive findings of S. haematobium eggs in urine.

Medical interviewing

Questionnaires were developed and tested in Sakalava, the dialect spoken in the study area. Questions regarding health concerns were carefully worded to ensure comprehension and relevance for the women. Detailed medical histories were obtained, specifically focusing on reproductive and sexual health. In identifying potential conditions associated with FGS, we thoroughly reviewed the existing literature, considering only clearly defined complaints directly linked to FGS and reported in at least two studies with representative samples of women affected by FGS. For publication purposes, the terms used in Sakalavan for the complaints were transcribed into French using layman’s terms and then translated literally into English.

Pelvic exam

A pelvic exam, including inspection and bimanual palpation, was conducted at baseline and at each of the three follow-up visits. The women were instructed not to clean their vulva and vagina on the day of the pelvic exam. If menstruating, participants were advised to reschedule the exam for a later date when bleeding had ceased.

During the pelvic exam, the woman was positioned in a dorsal lithotomy position with leg support. An exam of the vulva was performed by the naked eye. An appropriately sized vaginal speculum was gently introduced and cautiously opened to ensure minimum instrumental contact to the cervicovaginal epithelium, which was examined by the naked eye for cervicovaginal abnormalities, including bleeding and epithelial disruption defined as erosions, ulcerations, and friable cervical surface. Closer inspection in search of FGS-associated lesions was subsequently performed using a high-resolution Canon EOS M50 camera (Canon EOS M50; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 100mm macro-lens mounted with a circular LED light. Images of present cervical lesions were captured with the camera in autofocus mode and positioned approximately 30cm from the cervix. The best-quality images from baseline and from each follow-up visit were chosen from the portfolio of cervical images to evaluate FGS-associated cervical lesions. The digital images were stored in the Research Electronic Data Capture Version REDCap 9.5.6 data management system (REDCap) hosted by the North Denmark Regional Hospital.

Digital gridded imaging technique

The cervical images were assessed using the digital gridded image technique for quantifying FGS-associated cervical lesions with the application of the QubiFier software program, as previously reported (34). A semi-transparent circular grid composed of 424 equally sized squares, positioned to cover the cervical surface, was applied to each image. Squares that exhibited any of the four FGS-associated lesion types were marked manually. The number of marked squares was subsequently counted automatically by the QubiFier instrument and divided by 424, the number of affected squares. This quotient was multiplied by 100, resulting in a proportion range from 0 to 100 per cent. To derive the total quantum of lesions on the cervix, a cervical lesion proportion (CLP) was measured, representing all four lesion types. The proportion of each of the specific lesions [homogeneous yellow sandy patches proportion (HSP), grainy sandy patches proportion (GSP), and abnormal blood vessel proportion (BVP)] was calculated as a percentage between 0 and 100, in addition to a rubbery papules count (RPC) presented as an n-value. To assess the specific lesion types, an extended version of the original digital gridded image technique (34) has been developed, tested, and validated (35). A good to excellent interrater agreement has been found between observers for each of the specific lesion types and the total cervical lesion proportion.

The evaluation of the cervical images was conducted by an observer team comprising four medical students trained and supervised by a consultant gynaecologist with comprehensive experience in evaluating FGS-associated lesions. Hence, all five observers were considered proficient in this evaluation methodology. Each lesion type was assessed by the same observer, ensuring consistency in the scoring process among all images and visits. To guarantee consistent placement of the grid across images of the same woman, accounting for potential variations in image capture distance between visits, simultaneous assessment of all the selected images across baseline and the three follow-up visits was performed. Observers were blinded to the participant’s treatment group and the specific visit during which the image was captured.

Laboratory work

Several types of laboratory analyses were performed, including serum circulating anodic antigen (CAA), cervicovaginal S. haematobium DNA, urinary egg count, faecal parasites, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and bacterial vaginosis as described in the sections below. A comprehensive panel of blood and urine samples were collected from each participant at baseline and each follow-up. Stool samples were examined only at baseline. Samples from the cervix and posterior vaginal fornix using cytobrush and swabs were also collected at each of the four scheduled visits. In addition, a cervicovaginal lavage was performed as described: 10 mL of sterile 0.9% NaCl were sprayed on the surface of the cervix and the inner half of the vaginal surfaces with a syringe which was immediately pulled back. The procedure was repeated four times.

Schistosoma haematobium DNA

DNA originating from S. haematobium eggs was measured in cervicovaginal specimens collected from the participants at baseline and follow-up at Weeks 5 and 15. Vaginal lavage and cervical swab tests for S. haematobium DNA were stored in liquid nitrogen and shipped to the Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine at Nagasaki University, Japan. Using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), genomic DNA was extracted from 200 µL with both cervical swabs and vaginal lavage fluid. For identification of S. haematobium, the Schistosoma-specific internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) (GenBank accession DQ) region was amplified by real-time PCR, using a primer set consisting of forward Sh63F (5’-GGTCTAGATGACTTGATCGAGATGCT-3’) and reverse Sh139R (5’-TCCCGAGCG CGTATAATGTCATTA-3’) (36). Negative and positive control samples were included in each amplification run. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: incubation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. Amplification, detection, and analysis were performed with QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Singapore, Singapore) (37). The cycle threshold (Ct) cut-off value was set at 42 to categorise the samples into infection-positive or -negative.

Circulating anodic antigens

Circulating anodic antigens (CAA) were measured in serum samples collected at baseline and at Week 5-, Week 10-, and Week 15-follow-ups. Schistosome gut antigens are continuously excreted into the host circulation by metabolically active worms, the concentration of CAA reflecting the number of adult worms present in the circulation, independent of the anatomic location. The Up-Converting reporter Particle Lateral Flow test for the detection of schistosome CAA was used to detect Schistosoma infections (38). All serum samples were tested using the SCAA20 format using 20 µl of serum, while for the most sensitive concentration format we used 500 µl of serum (SCAA500) (39). In short, 20/500 μL aliquots were mixed with equal volumes of 4% (w/v) trichloro-acetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged to remove interfering proteins and to dissociate potential immune complexes. Supernatants (for the 500 µl aliquots after 25-fold concentration to 20 μL over a 10 kDa Amicon Ultra-0·5 mL Centrifugal Filter, Millipore Corporation) were incubated with the UCP-antibody conjugate solution and run on LF strips, which were scanned for UCP reporter signals with a Packard FluoroCount strip reader adapted for UCP detection. A standard dilution curve of the TCA-soluble fraction of adult worm antigen (AWA-TCA) with known CAA concentrations was used as reference to validate the cut-off (39). Results are expressed as pg CAA/mL serum; a CAA concentration above 1 pg/mL was considered positive (38).

Urine and stool examination

Morning urine samples were collected and subjected to filtration through a 14 µm polycarbonate membrane, with a volume of 50 mL, to ascertain the presence of S. haematobium eggs (40). Results are expressed as the number of eggs per 50 mL and evaluated at baseline and Week 15-follow-up. Using the Merthiolate Iode Formol (MIF) concentration technique, eggs in stool were identified at baseline only (41).

Eosinophilia

To assess the immunologic response to S. haematobium, blood samples were analysed for eosinophilia at baseline and 15-week follow-up. A differential white blood cell count was performed to assess the percentage of eosinophils present in the blood sample.

Sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis

Serum specimens were tested for Treponema pallidum at baseline by a rapid plasma reagin test (RPR) (Linear Cromatest, Montgat, Barcelona, Spain) and a hemagglutination assay (TPHA) (Linear Cromatest, Montgat, Barcelona, Spain) performed at the healthcare clinic in Ambanja. Direct microscopy was available at the local laboratory for detecting Trichomonas vaginalis in the vaginal fluid and enabled immediate diagnosis-guided treatment of trichomonas. Moreover, T. vaginalis was also assessed using PCR, as described below; data from the direct microscopy are not reported.

Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium infection, as well as bacterial vaginosis, was conducted at baseline and Week 15. For this purpose, cervicovaginal swabs were collected in 2 mL of Copan eNat using a regular flocked swab (Copan, Brescia, Italy). Specimens were stored at ambient temperature for no more than 12 hours until storage at minus 80°C was secured, subsequently to be shipped on dry ice to the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark, for analysis. DNA extraction was performed using 200 µL of the collected swab specimens on a MagNAPure instrument (Roche Molecular Systems Inc., CA, USA) with the Pathogen Universal 200 MagNA Pure protocol and eluted in 100 µL elution buffer. All real-time PCRs were performed with 5 µl of extracted DNA, each assay undergoing internal control for inhibition. For C. trachomatis, primers targeted the 16S rRNA gene (42), and the N. gonorrhoeae assay targeted the porA pseudogene (43) using a modified TaqMan® probe. Positive samples were confirmed by an assay targeting the opa gene (44). The T. vaginalis assay targeted a specific repeat sequence using primers as previously described (45) and a modified TaqMan MGB® probe. Positive results were confirmed by repeating the PCR. M. genitalium was detected using primers and probes targeting the major MgPa adhesin (46).

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) was also diagnosed at baseline and at follow-up 15 weeks later in a combined assay detecting the presence of abnormal vaginal microbiota, including Fannyhessea vaginae, also known as Atopopium vaginae, and Gardnerella species as previously described (47) using cut-off at 10,000 geq/µl template for F. vaginae and 100,000 geq/µl template for Gardnerella spp.

For detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) at baseline, a cervical swab specimen was collected using a cytobrush, which was subsequently stored in a dry tube at minus 80°C until further processing at the Centre for Clinical Research at the North Denmark Regional Hospital. DNA was purified from the cytobrushes using the QIAamp MinElute Media kit (QIAGEN). HPV detection was performed as previously described (48). HSV-1 and HSV-2 analyses were performed using the GeneProof Herpes Simplex virus (HSV-1/2) PCR kit according to the manufacturer´s recommendations. HPV and HSV analyses were performed in duplicates; samples were considered positive only if viral DNA was detected twice.

The results of the analyses conducted at the reference laboratories in Denmark were not promptly accessible during the baseline study period or at any of the subsequent visits. The treatment of STIs and other gynaecological disease manifestations, including BV and yeast infection, therefore had to be based on the syndromic approach recommended by the Ministry of Health of Madagascar (49). The study participants were moreover treated in accordance with the results of T. pallidum and T. vaginalis testing as part of the local study set-up. When results from the reference laboratory became available, the women and their partners were offered treatment.

Adverse events

For a period of 30 hours after the initial dosages of PZQ were administered at baseline, women in both treatment groups were thoroughly monitored by a physician from the research team. Any potential adverse events were documented and categorised by severity as mild, moderate, or major. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin levels were evaluated at baseline and 24 hours after the first dosage. Elevated values were defined as ALT levels ≥25 U/L and bilirubin levels exceeding 1 mg/dl.

Data management and analysis

A unique identifier (ID code) was assigned to each participant. The local team entered all data obtained at the investigation site in Madagascar into the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database on the virtual server at North Denmark Regional Hospital. The Danish research team entered other data obtained from the reference laboratory sites in the database, access to which required a personal username and password; all changes were automatically logged. Only authorised members of the team had access to the stored data. All data were handled to ensure data safety and observance of privacy rules according to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act. The ID code list and hard copies of all records were securely stored in a designated room at the local investigator’s site, with access restricted and safeguarded by using a locked cabinet accessible solely by the main investigator in Madagascar.

Statistics

Continuous data were summarised as mean (95% CI), and comparisons between Arm A and Arm B were conducted using an unpaired t-test; for comparison between time points a paired t-test was performed. Comparison between arms of difference from baseline to follow-up was made using an unpaired t-test. Data that failed to meet normal distribution underwent bootstrap analysis (5,000–8,000 replications) to calculate CI and p-values. Categorical data were described as number of patients (n,%) and compared between arms using Fisher’s exact test; McNemar’s test was used for comparison between time points. Comparison between arms of changes over time was performed using generalised linear models. Analyses were conducted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0.0.0 (Version 241)). P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

The clearance rate for cervicovaginal S. haematobium DNA was defined as the proportion of S. haematobium PCR-positive women before treatment compared with the proportion of S. haematobium PCR-negative at follow-up. The clearance rate for S. haematobium eggs in urine was calculated similarly.

Results

Of the 381 women assessed for eligibility by questionnaire and pelvic exam, 116 (88.5%) were enrolled in the RCT, with 58 randomly assigned to each treatment arm (A and B) (Figure 1). The participants’ mean age was 25.5 years (95% CI 24.3–26.7). No statistically significant differences were found between the two treatment arms regarding socio-demographic and reproductive health history characteristics (Table 2).

Figure 1Table 2

Participants eligible for final assessment of study outcomes

At the completion of clinical assessments at baseline, a single dose of PZQ was administered to all 58 women in Arm A (Supplementary Table 1). Eight participants failed to appear for follow-up at Week 15, leaving 50 women available for the final data analysis in Arm A (Figure 1). Dosing of PZQ three times within 24 hours was administered to the 58 women in Arm B at the end of the completed clinical assessment at baseline. As the third dose was not administered to one participant due to moderate vomiting after the second dose (12 hours after the initial dose), she was excluded from the final analysis. Hence, 57 women in Arm B received the complete PZQ dosage regimen at baseline as per the study protocol (Supplementary Table 1). Seven women failed to meet for the Week 5 session, and one woman was excluded from the study due to pregnancy. At Week 10, three women failed to appear for the treatment session; and with one further woman excluded from the study due to pregnancy, 45 women were available for the final data analysis in Arm B (Figure 1). Hence, a total of 95 women were included in the final per-protocol data analysis.

Cervical lesions

Due to suboptimal image quality in some instances, our assessment for the baseline evaluation was limited to 91 images (47 in Arm A, 44 in Arm B). At baseline, grainy sandy patches were found in 100% of the RCT population of 91 women, abnormal blood vessels in 95.6%, homogenous yellow sandy patches in 83.5%, and rubbery papules in 91.2%.

Comparison of lesion scores and counts showed no statistically significant differences between arms at baseline and at follow-ups at Weeks 5, 10, and 15 (Figure 2). Evaluating changes in CLP scores from baseline to the three follow-up visits, we observed a significant reduction in Arm B at Week 10 (p=0.001) (Figure 2). For both treatment arms, significant reductions in RPC were observed between baseline and all three time points, except between Arm A at baseline and Week 10 (p=0.10) and between Arm B at baseline and Week 15 (p=0.21). Regarding HSP, we noticed a significant reduction from baseline to Week 5 (p=0.010) in Arm B; a reduction which did not meet statistical significance at Week 10 (p=0.10) and Week 15 (p=0.15). There were no significant differences in HSP from baseline to any of the three follow-up visits for Arm A. In the same arm, we observed a significant reduction in GSP between baseline and Week 5 (p=0.005), while no significant changes were noted at Weeks 10 or 15. Similarly, no significant changes were observed in Arm B during any of the follow-up assessments. BVP showed no significant changes in either Arm A or B.

Figure 2

Pelvic exam abnormalities

Bleeding (upon instrumental contact or spontaneous) and epithelial disruption were the two main categories of abnormality observed in the women during the pelvic exam at baseline (Table 3). Both abnormalities had declined at Week 15 follow-up. However, in neither of the two treatment arms nor in the overall RCT population did the data reach statistical significance. Tenderness during the pelvic exam was reported by 39.6% of the women, either in relation to cervical motion (n=24), the uterus (n=18), or the adnexa (n=16). Cervical motion tenderness declined significantly in both treatment arms (p<0.01). A similar decline was observed in relation to uterine tenderness in Arm A (p=0.07) and in Arm B (p<0.01), and adnexal tenderness in Arm A (p=0.04).

Table 3

Urogenital complaints

Lower abdominal pain emerged as the most prevalent complaint reported by 53.7% of the women at baseline, followed by smelly vaginal discharge (48.4%), vulvovaginal itching (47.4%), sexual intercourse pain/abnormal sensation (47.4%), irregular menstruation (37.8%), abnormal colour of vaginal discharge (37.8%), painful micturition (30.5%), abnormal vulvovaginal sensation (23.3%), spontaneous bleeding episodes (15.8%), and bleeding after sexual intercourse (7.4%). A clear pattern of decline in urogenital complaints was observed from baseline to Week 15-follow-up in both treatment arms (Table 4). It is noteworthy that only Arm B, in contrast to Arm A (p=0.30), saw a statistically significant decline in reported irregular menstruation (p<0.001).

Table 4

Schistosoma biomarkers

Nine women (18.8%) in Arm A and five women (11.6%) in Arm B were positive for cervicovaginal S. haematobium DNA at baseline. By Week 5, two women in Arm A remained positive for S. haematobium DNA (clearance rate 77.8%). Although no women in Arm B were positive (clearance rate 100%), the clearance rate between the two treatment arms failed to reach statistically significant difference (p=0.396). None of the initially DNA-positive women were positive at Week 15 (100% cure rate). Two women in Arm A (4.2%) and one woman in Arm B (2.3%) had positive findings of cervicovaginal S. haematobium DNA by Week 15 despite having tested negative at the previous two visits.

Overall, 74.7% of the women tested positive for CAA in serum at baseline. The proportion of women testing positive for CAA in serum showed a statistical significant decrease in Arm B compared to Arm A at all follow-up visits (Figure 3). Both arms exhibited a reduction in mean CAA levels, with Arm B showing a notably statistical significant decrease compared to Arm A at Week 10 (p=0.02) and a nearly significant reduction at Week 15 (p=0.08) (Figure 3).

Figure 3

In Arm A, 38 women (76.0%) were found to have S. haematobium eggs in their baseline urine samples; three women remained positive at Week 15 (6.0%) with a clearance rate of 92.1%. In Arm B, the baseline urine samples from 31 women (68.9%) contained eggs; none were positive at Week 15 (100% clearance rate), with no significant difference between treatment arms (p=0.161). The mean egg count decreased from an initial range of 38.7 (18.7–66.1) to 4.0 (1.0–7.0) in Arm A (p=0.08), in Arm B from 42.5 (15.6–76.0) to 0 (p-values not computable). There was no significant difference in egg count reduction between the two treatment arms (p=1.00).

Stool findings

While none of the women were positive for Schistosoma mansoni eggs in the stool, our findings revealed the presence of other intestinal parasites. Three women (2.6%) were infected with Ankylostoma duodenale, and single cases (each accounting for 0.9%) of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Entamoeba hystolytica, and Hymenolepis nana were identified. Anti-helminthic treatment was administered to women with positive stool findings.

Eosinophilia

In Arm A, we noticed an increase in the blood eosinophil percentage from 6.98 at baseline to 7.38 at Week 15. In contrast, Arm B showed a decrease in the eosinophil percentage from 7.24 at baseline to 5.82 at Week 15. However, it should be highlighted that none of the changes were statistically significant when comparing the two time points within each group (Arm A: p=0.706, Arm B: p=0.181) and the two treatment arms (p=0.225).

Sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis

Five women were diagnosed with T. pallidum infection at baseline (Table 5). Moreover, 45.2% and 4.3% of the women were diagnosed with HPV and HSV, respectively, while 39.3% were diagnosed with either N. gonorrhoea, C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, or T. vaginalis. At Week 15-follow-up, the overall percentage of the four latter pathogens had risen to 46.1%. The number of women diagnosed with BV likewise increased from baseline to follow-up at Week 15, from 16 (18.2%) to 35 women (39.8%) (Table 5). At no time was a statistically significant difference observed between the arms. For an overview of the medications administered to the women due to STI symptoms or positive field laboratory test results, see Supplementary Table 2.

Table 5

Outcomes in women with no sexually transmitted infection or bacterial vaginosis

Since STIs and bacterial vaginosis BV can mimic the symptoms and signs of FGS, it is important to assess the outcome measures in women without these conditions. Among 16 women (8 in each treatment arm), no STI or BV was detected during any visit from baseline to Week 15. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms regarding cervical lesions, urogenital complaints, or pelvic exam abnormalities (Supplementary Tables 3, 4).

Safety

Overall, no major adverse events were observed in either of the two treatment arms, all events being registered as potentially related to the PZQ treatment (Supplementary Table 5). In Arm A, mild to moderate events were registered in 22 women (37.9%) after baseline treatment. The most frequent symptom was elevated ALT levels, 17 women testing above the upper normal limit (29.3%). Five of the 17 women with elevated post-treatment ALT levels had already exhibited elevated ALT levels before administration of the PZQ treatment. In Arm B, the majority of adverse events were recorded after administration of the 12-hour dose. Vomiting was the predominant symptom reported (12.1%) for all women. In Arm B, seven women (12.1%) displayed elevated levels of ALT 24 hours after the first treatment administration. Elevated ALT levels had also been detected prior to PZQ treatment in five individuals. We found no significant changes in mean levels of ALT and bilirubin between the two arms at baseline; neither was this the case from baseline to Week 15-follow-up in any of the treatment arms.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to evaluate a repeated PZQ regimen for the treatment of FGS in comparison to the standard PZQ single-dose regimen as currently recommended by the World Health Organization (50). Having clinical implications in particular for reproductive health, FGS may require a different therapeutic approach than is normally practiced for urinary schistosomiasis in large-scale morbidity control programmes.

Only a few observational studies have evaluated post-treatment outcomes in women with FGS using a PZQ standard regimen of 40mg/kg (3, 51). Kjetland et al. found no association between PZQ treatment and significant reduction in genital lesions at 12-month follow-up (11). A similar finding was made in this RCT. Neither CLP nor the three specific lesion-type proportions had declined significantly at 15- week follow-up in any of the two treatment arms. However, RPC did show a significant decline but only in the group of women who received the PZQ standard regimen. We moreover found significantly lower proportions for most of the specific lesion types and CLP when comparing findings at Week 5 and/or at Week 10 with baseline findings. However, the significant reduction seemed to have diminished by Week 15, a tendency that may be attributed to potential reinfection with S. haematobium during the study period and the maturing of the early parasitic stages into adult worms, causing new lesions to develop.

Rubbery papules probably represent a cervical lesion type of more recent pathogenetic origin than the other three lesion types. In contrast, grainy sandy patches, homogeneous yellow sandy patches, and abnormal blood vessels are characterised by long-term chronicity spanning years or decades since early childhood (10). As a result, it may be anticipated that the three lesion types tend to become refractory to PZQ treatment. PZQ having killed the adult Schistosoma worms dwelling in the pelvic region, the influx and disposition of new eggs in the urogenital organs are reduced. As a result of this immediate treatment outcome, the egg-induced inflammatory processes in the affected tissue may diminish, thus allowing a certain extent of spontaneous healing. However, the common occurrence of reinfection in endemic areas means that the treated women experience only temporary benefits. While PZQ treatment may cause some resolution of rubbery papules at Week 15, even when the drug is administered in a single-dose regime, no major clinical impact should necessarily be expected due to the relatively insignificant contribution of rubbery papules to the overall burden of FGS-associated vaginocervical pathology and morbidity.

We note that the follow-up evaluation in the RCT was performed 15 weeks after baseline, leaving relatively little time for the healing of grainy sandy patches, homogeneous yellow sandy patches, and abnormal blood vessels. It cannot be ruled out that the final evaluation of the effect of the repetitive PZQ treatment regimen on the resolution of the three lesion types, some of which may endure for years, requires more than 15 weeks to follow-up. However, even in a best-case scenario, this would probably evidence only partial resolution of the lesions. Such marginal improvement is to be expected in view of the findings reported by Kjetland et al. from their 12-month follow-up study (11). The findings of our RCT provide a relevant supplement to the findings of the previous study as our digital gridded image technique assessment of lesions was purely quantitative. While this tool provides opportunities for more detailed insights into the resolution of the different cervical lesions, it likewise contributes to our understanding of the natural history of FGS.

Concerning pelvic exam abnormalities, no significant improvement of the two vaginal bleeding parameters (bleeding upon instrumental contact and spontaneous bleeding) was observed in this RCT, neither in the overall trial population nor in the two treatment arms. However, the women who received the repeated PZQ-dosing treatment (Arm B) experienced a near-significant improvement relating to bleeding upon instrumental contact. Moreover, for all three categories (cervical motion, uterine, and adnexal tenderness) the entire trial population reported fewer tenderness complaints during the pelvic exam, thus giving evidence of a significant decline from baseline to follow-up. In general, we found a significant decline in urogenital complaints by the women at Week 15-follow-up. Even though FGS-associated cervical lesions appear refractory to PZQ treatment, we believe that the observed improvements for both pelvic exam abnormalities and for urogenital complaints promise potential benefits for women’s reproductive health. The observed pattern of decline in pelvic exam abnormalities and urogenital complaints in conjunction with PZQ treatment suggests causality between FGS and the gynaecological manifestations. This observation supports the therapeutic effect of PZQ as part of the overall FGS morbidity control strategy, even if only partial resolution of the chronic cervicovaginal was achieved.

We note that the pattern of clinical improvements occurred despite the fact that the prevalence of STI and BV at Week 15-follow-up remained high, and was at an even higher level compared to baseline. STI and BV may, along with S. haematobium infection, also have contributed to the observed gynaecological manifestations. Uncertainty thus remains in relation to the apparent discrepancy between the significant decline in vaginal discharge complaints in the women at follow-up, even though vaginal discharge is strongly associated with STI and BV, both of which were even more prevalent in Week 15 compared to baseline.

Given the substantial overlap of symptoms and clinical findings between STI and FGS, it may have been advantageous to exclude women with STI and/or BV. However, because of the high prevalence of STI among women with FGS, we opted to test the repeated-dosing regimen in the general population rather than excluding those with STI and/or BV. To address the symptom and sign overlap between FGS and STIs/BV, all clinical outcome analyses were conducted in the subset of women without STIs or BV (eight in each treatment arm). These analyses did not provide stronger evidence for the efficacy of the repeated dose regimen.

During the study period, the frequency and mean values of the three Schistosoma biomarkers saw a significant decline, verifying the effect of PZQ treatment on S. haematobium infection in general, and FGS specifically, as demonstrated by the reduction in the proportion of women detected positive for cervicovaginal S. haematobium DNA. We also note our observation in Arm B of a significantly lower percentage of women with CAA in serum compared to Arm A and likewise a significantly lower CAA mean value at Week 10 in Arm B. These findings suggest that the repeated PZQ dosing regimen is more effective in reducing the Schistosoma worm burden compared with the standard single-dose regimen.

Neither the cervical lesions nor the pelvic exam abnormalities nor the Schistosoma biomarker findings in this RCT provides convincing support for replacing the standard PZQ single-dose regimen with a repeated PZQ-dose regimen. The implementation of repeated dosing across sub-Saharan Africa would prove difficult when considered in the larger context of FGS morbidity control and separated from the existing and well-integrated single-dose PZQ strategy directed at all those infected with S. haematobium, irrespective of age and sex. Rather, we believe that by commencing treatment of girls and boys very early in life with regular intervals and maintaining the strategy continuously into adulthood, this egg-induced pathology may be prevented from establishing a level of severity and chronicity by which adequate resolution of pathology is no longer achievable by PZQ as observed in our trial.

This RCT has some limitations. Firstly, the effect of treatment was evaluated only by assessment of FGS-associated lesions of the cervix. A more complete investigation of pathology resolution in the cervicovaginal mucosa lining after PZQ treatment may have been obtained by simultaneously procuring data for similar lesion types in the vagina. Using the cervical lesion approach as a proxy for a broader spectrum of FGS-associated pathology in the lower genital tract means that interpretation of the conclusions of the RCT should bear this limitation in mind.

Secondly, as the study population was selected to comprise only women with FGS-associated lesions, the secondary-effect outcomes of PZQ treatment do not allow a comprehensive interpretation in relation to pelvic exam abnormalities and urogenital complaints because women with FGS, not being detected with FGS-associated cervical lesions, were not included in the study.

Thirdly, our failure to convince the participants to refrain from vulvovaginal cleaning before the pelvic exam means that their urogenital complaints concerning abnormal vaginal discharge could not be compared with the objective findings of the pelvic exam.

Fourthly, rather than the chosen three-month exclusion criterion of women treated with PZQ prior to baseline, a six-to-twelve-month interval would have been more appropriate. However, constraints on availability and economy and the absence of a mass drug program targeting adults mean that few of the women in the study area receive treatment for schistosomiasis. Moreover, randomising the women have further alleviated this concern, and as evidenced by the baseline data demonstrating comparability among women in the two treatment arms.

The trial further carries a risk of bias since neither the participants nor the research team in Madagascar were blinded to arm allocation or visit. While a double-blinded study would have been advantageous, logistical constraints in the field made this unfeasible, primarily due to the limited number of investigators in the remote rural setting of the study, where medication and examination were conducted by the same physician. However, blinding in the evaluation of cervical lesions, our primary study outcome, was secured by a setup ensuring that assessors had no knowledge of group allocation or visit number.

The discrepancy in follow-up durations between the two treatment arms should also be noted. Women in the single-treatment Arm A had a 15-week interval from baseline treatment to final assessment. In contrast, the repeated-treatment Arm B had only a 5-week gap from the last dose of PZQ to the final assessment at Week 15, allowing a longer period for potential reinfection with S. haematobium. This may have contributed to a higher incidence of reinfection and subsequent positive biomarker results among women in Arm A.

Conclusions

The findings of this RCT yield inadequate support for replacing the PZQ single-dose regimen with a repeated-dosing regimen for treating gynaecological manifestations associated with FGS. Neither the pelvic exam abnormalities nor specific cervicovaginal lesions nor the urogenital complaints as observed at the Week 15-follow-up support a repeated-dosing regimen. Overall, as the cervical lesions in women with FGS appear refractory to PZQ treatment, this constitutes an imperative call for regular mass-retreatment strategy starting early in life for girls and boys living in Schistosoma-endemic areas to prevent chronic pathology and establish a level at which resolution by PZQ treatment is no longer an option. Finally, the RCT has confirmed the frequent co-existence of STI and BV in women with FGS. This finding is essential when developing syndromic treatment strategies for the healthcare management of women with urogenital complaints living in Schistosoma-endemic areas.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. The studies involving humans were approved by Committee of Ethics at the Ministry of Health in Antananarivo (Comité d’Ethique de la Recherche Bio-Médicale auprès du Ministère de la Santé Publique); (Authorization Number: 098-MSANP/CERBM; Number: 059-MSANP/CERBM; Number: 065 MSANP/SG/-AGMED/CNPV/CERBM). The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was required from all the participants. Girls can be affected by FGS since pre-puberty, and life-threatening sequels of FGS may already occur at an adolescent age, therefore we considered it unethical to exclude women 15-17-years old from the study. To respect confidentiality of these adolescent participants, the informed consent of a third party (parent or legal guardian) was not asked for. The Ethics committee approved this procedure.

Author contributions

LA: Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. BR: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TR: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. CR: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. KJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Validation. KK: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. DB: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Project administration, Validation. CB: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. SS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ML: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Formal analysis. MJ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. SL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. JJ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Methodology. PC: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. PH: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Methodology. GJ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. NK: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. SH: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. PL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The authors declare that this study received funding from Merck KGaA, 250 Frankfurters Strasse, , Darmstadt, Germany (Funder's Study ID Number: MS-). The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the following individuals and Organizations for their invaluable contributions and support of the research study: Prof. Dr. Hermann Feldmeier, Institute of Microbiology and Infection Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universtät Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, Clara Fabienne Rasoamanamihaja, Paulin Ramasy Manjary, and Bemarivo Jeannoé Assany, Ministry of Health, Antananarivo, Madagascar, Kristine Brøndbjerg Øby and Maria Jensen, Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Denmark.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10./fitd../full#supplementary-material

References

7 new Ph. Eur. reference standard and 17 replacement batches ...

  • New Ph. Eur. reference standards and Replacement batches for Ph. Eur. reference standards
  • Distribution quota
  • Removal
  • Future removal
  • Change of sales units
  • Information on change of amount per unit
  • Information on change of price
  • Change of EDQM storage/shipping conditions
  • Information on International Chemical Reference Substances (ICRS) and International Standards for Antibiotics (ISA)
  • Rules about Substances depleting the ozone layer

See also:

  • Content of the Ph. Eur. RS catalogue
  • How to place an RS order
  • The EDQM helps the users to test some draft texts proposed in Pharmeuropa through Qualified Samples

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) announces the release of:

  • 7 new European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) reference standards:

Catalogue code

Name

Unit quantity

Price

Y

Ciprofibrate for system suitability B CRS

2.03 mg

79 EUR

Y

Erlotinib impurity mixture CRS

0.002 mg

79 EUR

Y

Chloroxylenol for system suitability CRS

55 mg

79 EUR

Y

Haloperidol decanoate impurity mixture CRS

0.08 mg

79 EUR

Y

Colchicine for system suitability B CRS

10 mg

79 EUR

Y

Lercanidipine hydrochloride CRS

90 mg

300 EUR

Y

Rhodiola root and rhizome dry extract for system suitability HRS

60 mg

79 EUR

  • 17 replacement batches for Ph. Eur. reference standards:

Catalogue code

Name

Batch

Unit quantity

Price

Y

Etonogestrel impurity mixture CRS

2

100 µL

79 EUR

Y

Ginkgolic acids CRS

4

50 mg

For more Praziquantel Ep Standardinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.

Explore more:
Ivermectin Vs Ivomec: Which One Should You Choose?

79 EUR

Y

Nimesulide for peak identification CRS

4

10 mg

79 EUR

D

Dihydroergocristine mesilate CRS

4

120 mg

79 EUR

D

Dimenhydrinate CRS

2

50 mg

79 EUR

Y

Epinastine for system suitability A CRS

2

10 mg

79 EUR

Y

Eplerenone for peak identification CRS

2

10 mg

79 EUR

Y

Erythropoietin for physicochemical tests CRS

2

16 mg

170 EUR

Y

Fluocinolone acetonide for system suitability CRS

2

15 mg

79 EUR

Y

Pemetrexed disodium heptahydrate CRS

3

200 mg

79 EUR

B

Biperiden hydrochloride CRS

2

60 mg

79 EUR

R

Reserpine CRS

4

100 mg

79 EUR

Y

Bupivacaine impurity E CRS

5

20 mg

79 EUR

Y

Equilin CRS

2

20 mg

79 EUR

P

Penicillamine CRS

2

100 mg

79 EUR

C

Chlorhexidine CRS

6

50 mg

79 EUR

P

Praziquantel CRS

5

200 mg

79 EUR

  • Distribution quota

Information on distribution quota for Immunoglobulin (anti-A, anti-B antibodies test Negative control) BRP (Y)

Due to premature depletion of stocks of the Immunoglobulin (anti-A, anti-B antibodies test Negative control) BRP (cat. # Y), we wish to inform users that a tight distribution quota has been established.

This BRP will be distributed to plasma-derived therapeutic product manufacturers and Official Medicines Control Laboratories only, with a maximum of 1 unit per month. This quota may be adjusted according to availability.

This exceptional measure will remain in place until the next batch of this BRP is established, which is expected by the end of .

Distribution of the Immunoglobulin for anti-A, anti-B antibodies limit test BRP (cat. # Y) and the Immunoglobulin (anti-A, anti-B antibodies test Positive control) BRP (cat. # Y) is not affected by this measure.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Information on reference standards removed from catalogue

  • Supplement 11.3

Following the implementation of Supplement 11.3, the following standards are officially withdrawn (or replaced) from 1 January .

Information on reference standards with a future removal from catalogue

  • Supplement 11.4

Following the implementation of Supplement 11.4, the following standards will be officially withdrawn (or replaced) from 1st April .

  • Supplement 11.5

Following the implementation of Supplement 11.5, the following standard will be officially withdrawn (or replaced) from 1st July .

  • Additional removal from catalogue

Information on change of sales units

  • The sales unit of Erythropoietin for physicochemical tests CRS (Y) has been changed from 3 to 1 unit. The quantity per vial is sufficient to perform the test mentioned in Ph. Eur. monograph .

Information on change of amount per unit

  • Equilin CRS (Y) batch 2 contains 20mg per unit (15 mg previously)
  • Fluocinolone acetonide for system suitability CRS (Y) batch 2 contains 15mg per unit (10 mg previously)
  • Erythropoietin for physicochemical tests CRS (Y) batch 2 contains 16mg per unit (0.1 mg previously)
  • Dihydroergocristine mesilate CRS (D) batch 4 contains 120mg per unit (250 mg previously)
  • Dimenhydrinate CRS (D) batch 2 contains 50mg per unit (100 mg previously)

Information on change of price

  • None

Information on change of EDQM storage/shipping conditions

Based on new stability information, storage and shipping conditions will be changed on 15 April for the following reference standard:

  • Atorvastatin for peak identification B (Y) CRS batch 1 is stored at -20°C (previously +5°C) and shipped on ice at -20°C (previously ambiant).

Information on International Chemical Reference Substances (ICRS) and International Standards for Antibiotics (ISA)

ICRS

  • None

ISA

  • None

Rules about substances depleting the ozone layer

Regulation (EU) /590 on substances that deplete the ozone layer entered into force on 11 March . The rules governing the placing on the market and use of ozone-depleting substances for essential laboratory and analytical uses have now changed.

Under the new regulation, standards shipped to a location within the European Union no longer need to be registered in the labODS registry.

There is no change to the procedure for shipments outside the European Union.

The EDQM Reference Standards affected by this change are:

R

Class 1 residual solvent solution CRS

T

Trichlorotrifluoroethane CRS

Important notes:

In all cases, these Reference Standards supplied by the EDQM must be used exclusively for essential laboratory and analytical uses (i.e. for analytical uses in conjunction with the texts published in the European Pharmacopoeia).

We would also like to draw your attention to the obligations of users affected by this change that are described under Article 8(4) of this regulation.

Content of the European Pharmacopoeia RS catalogue

The EDQM proposes more than 3 100 Ph. Eur. RS including a wide range of highly characterised chemical reference substances (CRS), herbal reference standards (HRS) and biological reference preparations (BRP), as well as reference spectra for the tests and assays to be carried out in accordance with the official methods prescribed in the Ph. Eur.

The Ph. Eur. RS catalogue is updated on a daily basis and gives access not only to all the Ph. Eur. RS, but also to:

  • batch validity statements (BVSs) for each reference standard;
  • Safety Data Sheets and Safety Data Statements for hazardous biologicals;
  • leaflets (downloadable PDFs).

For your convenience, the Ph. Eur. RS catalogue is published daily and can be downloaded in in PDF format and in XML format.

When stocks of a given reference standard are low, the EDQM reserves the right to limit the quantities sold to each user to ensure that as many users as possible will receive at least some of the quantities available. Restrictions on quantities are applied at the time the purchase order is received.

Following a request from many users, the quantities allowed in case of sales restrictions now appear in the online catalogue as well as in the catalogue in XML format.

The EDQM is also responsible for the establishment, preparation, storage and distribution of WHO International Chemical Reference Standards (ICRS) and International Standards for Antibiotics (ISA).

How to place an RS order

If you wish to place an order, you can send your request to the EDQM either:

  • via the WebStore;
  • or by to [ protected] (in this case, please ensure that your order, on your company letterhead, states both the catalogue code and substance name and is attached to your ).

A video has been prepared to help user ordering through the RS WebStore.

The EDQM helps the users to test some draft texts proposed in Pharmeuropa through Qualified Samples

In some cases, ‘qualified samples’ are made available by the EDQM at the time of publication in Pharmeuropa to allow users to check the changes (e.g. to the related substances test) proposed during the public enquiry and best prepare for the implementation of the monograph.

Where a qualified sample is available, it is described in the briefing note of the Pharmeuropa monograph and may be ordered free of charge by raising a request in the EDQM HelpDesk. After use, users are kindly requested to share their results with the EDQM.

To place an order via the EDQM HelpDesk, please click on European Pharmacopoeia and choose the category Question about General Chapters and Monographs. Providing us with your full shipping address and the title of the corresponding Ph. Eur. monograph, while stating ‘Qualified sample’ in the subject of the query, will help us to rapidly process your request.

The company is the world’s best Praziquantel Api Production Plant supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.

Comments

0/2000

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject

Your Message: (required)

0/2000