What Are the Advantages of Light Guide For Scintillator Array?
Scintillator - Wikipedia
A scintillator ( SIN-til-ay-ter) is a material that exhibits scintillation, the property of luminescence, when excited by ionizing radiation. Luminescent materials, when struck by an incoming particle, absorb its energy and scintillate (i.e. re-emit the absorbed energy in the form of light).[a] Sometimes, the excited state is metastable, so the relaxation back down from the excited state to lower states is delayed (necessitating anywhere from a few nanoseconds to hours depending on the material). The process then corresponds to one of two phenomena: delayed fluorescence or phosphorescence. The correspondence depends on the type of transition and hence the wavelength of the emitted optical photon.
Principle of operation
[edit]A scintillation detector or scintillation counter is obtained when a scintillator is coupled to an electronic light sensor such as a photomultiplier tube (PMT), photodiode, or silicon photomultiplier. PMTs absorb the light emitted by the scintillator and re-emit it in the form of electrons via the photoelectric effect. The subsequent multiplication of those electrons (sometimes called photo-electrons) results in an electrical pulse which can then be analyzed and yield meaningful information about the particle that originally struck the scintillator.
Vacuum photodiodes are similar but do not amplify the signal while silicon photodiodes, on the other hand, detect incoming photons by the excitation of charge carriers directly in the silicon. Silicon photomultipliers consist of an array of photodiodes which are reverse-biased with sufficient voltage to operate in avalanche mode, enabling each pixel of the array to be sensitive to single photons.[citation needed]
History
[edit]The first device which used a scintillator was built in , by Sir William Crookes and used a ZnS screen. The scintillations produced by the screen were visible if viewed by a microscope in a darkened room; the device was known as a spinthariscope. The technique led to a number of important discoveries but was obviously tedious. Scintillators gained additional attention in , when Curran and Baker replaced the naked eye measurement with the newly developed PMT. This was the birth of the modern scintillation detector.
Applications for scintillators
[edit]Scintillators are used by the American government as Homeland Security radiation detectors. Scintillators can also be used in particle detectors, new energy resource exploration, X-ray security, nuclear cameras, computed tomography and gas exploration.
Other applications of scintillators include CT scanners and gamma cameras in medical diagnostics, and screens in older style CRT computer monitors and television sets. Scintillators have also been proposed as part of theoretical models for the harnessing of gamma-ray energy through the photovoltaic effect, for example in a nuclear battery.
The use of a scintillator in conjunction with a photomultiplier tube finds wide use in hand-held survey meters used for detecting and measuring radioactive contamination and monitoring nuclear material. Scintillators generate light in fluorescent tubes, to convert the ultra-violet of the discharge into visible light. Scintillation detectors are also used in the petroleum industry as detectors for Gamma Ray logs.
Properties of scintillators
[edit]There are many desired properties of scintillators, such as high density, fast operation speed, low cost, radiation hardness, production capability, and durability of operational parameters. High density reduces the material size of showers for high-energy γ-quanta and electrons. The range of Compton scattered photons for lower energy γ-rays is also decreased via high density materials. This results in high segmentation of the detector and leads to better spatial resolution. Usually high density materials have heavy ions in the lattice (e.g., lead, cadmium), significantly increasing the contribution of photoelectric effect (~Z4). The increased photo-fraction is important for some applications such as positron emission tomography.
High stopping power for electromagnetic component of the ionizing radiation needs greater photo-fraction; this allows for a compact detector. High operating speed is needed for good resolution of spectra. Precision of time measurement with a scintillation detector is proportional to √τsc. Short decay times are important for the measurement of time intervals and for the operation in fast coincidence circuits. High density and fast response time can allow detection of rare events in particle physics. Particle energy deposited in the material of a scintillator is proportional to the scintillator's response.
Charged particles, γ-quanta and ions have different slopes when their response is measured. Thus, scintillators could be used to identify various types of γ-quanta and particles in fluxes of mixed radiation. Another consideration of scintillators is the cost of producing them. Most crystal scintillators require high-purity chemicals and sometimes rare-earth metals that are fairly expensive. Not only are the materials an expenditure, but many crystals require expensive furnaces and almost six months of growth and analyzing time. Currently, other scintillators are being researched for reduced production cost.
Several other properties are also desirable in a good detector scintillator: a low gamma output (i.e., a high efficiency for converting the energy of incident radiation into scintillation photons), transparency to its own scintillation light (for good light collection), efficient detection of the radiation being studied, a high stopping power, good linearity over a wide range of energy, a short rise time for fast timing applications (e.g., coincidence measurements), a short decay time to reduce detector dead-time and accommodate high event rates, emission in a spectral range matching the spectral sensitivity of existing PMTs (although wavelength shifters can sometimes be used), an index of refraction near that of glass (≈1.5) to allow optimum coupling to the PMT window. Ruggedness and good behavior under high temperature may be desirable where resistance to vibration and high temperature is necessary (e.g., oil exploration). The practical choice of a scintillator material is usually a compromise among those properties to best fit a given application.
Among the properties listed above, the light output is the most important, as it affects both the efficiency and the resolution of the detector (the efficiency is the ratio of detected particles to the total number of particles impinging upon the detector; the energy resolution is the ratio of the full width at half maximum of a given energy peak to the peak position, usually expressed in %). The light output is a strong function of the type of incident particle or photon and of its energy, which therefore strongly influences the type of scintillation material to be used for a particular application.
The presence of quenching effects results in reduced light output (i.e., reduced scintillation efficiency). Quenching refers to all radiationless de‑excitation processes in which the excitation is degraded mainly to heat. The overall signal production efficiency of the detector, however, also depends on the quantum efficiency of the PMT (typically ~30% at peak), and on the efficiency of light transmission and collection (which depends on the type of reflector material covering the scintillator and light guides, the length/shape of the light guides, any light absorption, etc.). The light output is often quantified as a number of scintillation photons produced per keV of deposited energy. Typical numbers are (when the incident particle is an electron): ≈40 photons/keV for NaI(Tl), ~10 photons/keV for plastic scintillators, and ~8 photons/keV for bismuth germanate (BGO).
Scintillation detectors are generally assumed to be linear. This assumption is based on two requirements: (1) that the light output of the scintillator is proportional to the energy of the incident radiation; (2) that the electrical pulse produced by the photomultiplier tube is proportional to the emitted scintillation light. The linearity assumption is usually a good rough approximation, although deviations can occur (especially pronounced for particles heavier than the proton at low energies).
Resistance and good behavior under high-temperature, high-vibration environments is especially important for applications such as oil exploration (wireline logging, measurement while drilling). For most scintillators, light output and scintillation decay time depends on the temperature. This dependence can largely be ignored for room-temperature applications since it is usually weak. The dependence on the temperature is also weaker for organic scintillators than it is for inorganic crystals, such as NaI-Tl or BGO. Strong dependence of decay time on the temperature in BGO scintillator is used for remote monitoring of temperature in vacuum environment. The coupled PMTs also exhibit temperature sensitivity, and can be damaged if submitted to mechanical shock. Hence, high temperature rugged PMTs should be used for high-temperature, high-vibration applications.
The time evolution of the number of emitted scintillation photons N in a single scintillation event can often be described by linear superposition of one or two exponential decays. For two decays, we have the form:
N = A exp ( − t τ f ) + B exp ( − t τ s ) {\displaystyle N=A\exp \left(-{\frac {t}{{\tau }_{f}}}\right)+B\exp \left(-{\frac {t}{{\tau }_{s}}}\right)}
where τf and τs are the fast (or prompt) and the slow (or delayed) decay constants. Many scintillators are characterized by 2 time components: one fast (or prompt), the other slow (or delayed). While the fast component usually dominates, the relative amplitude A and B of the two components depend on the scintillating material. Both of these components can also be a function of the energy loss dE/dx. In cases where this energy loss dependence is strong, the overall decay time constant varies with the type of incident particle. Such scintillators enable pulse shape discrimination, i.e., particle identification based on the decay characteristics of the PMT electric pulse. For instance, when BaF2 is used, γ rays typically excite the fast component, while α particles excite the slow component: it is thus possible to identify them based on the decay time of the PMT signal.
Types of scintillators
[edit]Organic crystals
[edit]Organic scintillators are aromatic hydrocarbon compounds which contain benzene ring structures interlinked in various ways. Their luminescence typically decays within a few nanoseconds.
Some organic scintillators are pure crystals. The most common types are anthracene (C
14H
10, decay time ≈30 ns), stilbene (C
14H
12, 4.5 ns decay time), and naphthalene (C
10H
8, few ns decay time). They are very durable, but their response is anisotropic (which spoils energy resolution when the source is not collimated), and they cannot be easily machined, nor can they be grown in large sizes; hence they are not very often used. Anthracene has the highest light output of all organic scintillators and is therefore chosen as a reference: the light outputs of other scintillators are sometimes expressed as a percentage of anthracene light output.
Organic liquids
[edit]These are liquid solutions of one or more organic scintillators in an organic solvent. The typical solutes are fluors such as p-terphenyl (C
18H
14), PBD (C
20H
14N
2O), butyl PBD (C
24H
22N
2O), PPO (C
15H
11NO), and wavelength shifter such as POPOP (C
24H
16N
2O). The most widely used solvents are toluene, xylene, benzene, phenylcyclohexane, triethylbenzene, and decalin. Liquid scintillators are easily loaded with other additives such as wavelength shifters to match the spectral sensitivity range of a particular PMT, or 10B to increase the neutron detection efficiency of the scintillation counter itself (since 10B has a high interaction cross section with thermal neutrons). Newer approaches combine several solvents or load different metals to achieve identification of incident particles.[12][13] For many liquids, dissolved oxygen can act as a quenching agent and lead to reduced light output, hence the necessity to seal the solution in an oxygen-free, airtight enclosure.
Plastic scintillators
[edit]The term "plastic scintillator" typically refers to a scintillating material in which the primary fluorescent emitter, called a fluor, is suspended in the base, a solid polymer matrix. While this combination is typically accomplished through the dissolution of the fluor prior to bulk polymerization, the fluor is sometimes associated with the polymer directly, either covalently or through coordination, as is the case with many Li6 plastic scintillators. Polyethylene naphthalate has been found to exhibit scintillation by itself without any additives and is expected to replace existing plastic scintillators due to higher performance and lower price.
The advantages of plastic scintillators include fairly high light output and a relatively quick signal, with a decay time of 2–4 nanoseconds, but perhaps the biggest advantage of plastic scintillators is their ability to be shaped, through the use of molds or other means, into almost any desired form with what is often a high degree of durability. Plastic scintillators are known to show light output saturation when the energy density is large (Birks' Law).
Bases
[edit]The most common bases used in plastic scintillators are the aromatic plastics, polymers with aromatic rings as pendant groups along the polymer backbone, amongst which polyvinyltoluene (PVT) and polystyrene (PS) are the most prominent. While the base does fluoresce in the presence of ionizing radiation, its low yield and negligible transparency to its own emission make the use of fluors necessary in the construction of a practical scintillator. Aside from the aromatic plastics, the most common base is polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), which carries two advantages over many other bases: high ultraviolet and visible light transparency and mechanical properties and higher durability with respect to brittleness. The lack of fluorescence associated with PMMA is often compensated through the addition of an aromatic co-solvent, usually naphthalene. A plastic scintillator based on PMMA in this way boasts transparency to its own radiation, helping to ensure uniform collection of light.
Other common bases include polyvinyl xylene (PVX) polymethyl, 2,4-dimethyl, 2,4,5-trimethyl styrenes, polyvinyl diphenyl, polyvinyl naphthalene, polyvinyl tetrahydronaphthalene, and copolymers of these and other bases.
Fluors
[edit]Also known as luminophors, these compounds absorb the scintillation of the base and then emit at larger wavelength, effectively converting the ultraviolet radiation of the base into the more easily transferred visible light. Further increasing the attenuation length can be accomplished through the addition of a second fluor, referred to as a spectrum shifter or converter, often resulting in the emission of blue or green light.
Common fluors include polyphenyl hydrocarbons, oxazole and oxadiazole aryls, especially, n-terphenyl (PPP), 2,5-diphenyloxazole (PPO), 1,4-di-(5-phenyl-2-oxazolyl)-benzene (POPOP), 2-phenyl-5-(4-biphenylyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (PBD), and 2-(4’-tert-butylphenyl)-5-(4’’-biphenylyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (B-PBD).
Inorganic crystals
[edit]Inorganic scintillators are usually crystals grown in high temperature furnaces, for example, alkali metal halides, often with a small amount of activator impurity. The most widely used is NaI(Tl) (thallium-doped sodium iodide); its scintillation light is blue. Other inorganic alkali halide crystals are: CsI(Tl), CsI(Na), CsI(pure), CsF, KI(Tl), LiI(Eu). Some non-alkali crystals include: BGO, BaF
2, CaF
2(Eu), ZnS(Ag), CaWO
4, CdWO
4, YAG(Ce) (Y
3Al
5O
12(Ce)), GSO, LSO, GAGG:Ce. (For more examples, see also phosphors).[18]
Newly developed products include LaCl
3(Ce), lanthanum chloride doped with cerium, as well as a cerium-doped lanthanum bromide, LaBr
3(Ce). They are both very hygroscopic (i.e., damaged when exposed to moisture in the air) but offer excellent light output and energy resolution (63 photons/keV γ for LaBr
3(Ce) versus 38 photons/keV γ for NaI(Tl)), a fast response (16 ns for LaBr
3(Ce) versus 230 ns for NaI(Tl) ), excellent linearity, and a very stable light output over a wide range of temperatures. In addition LaBr3(Ce) offers a higher stopping power for γ rays (density of 5.08 g/cm3 versus 3.67 g/cm3 for NaI(Tl) ). LYSO (Lu
1.8Y
0.2SiO
5(Ce)) has an even higher density (7.1 g/cm3, comparable to BGO), is non-hygroscopic, and has a higher light output than BGO (32 photons/keV γ), in addition to being rather fast (41 ns decay time versus 300 ns for BGO).
A disadvantage of some inorganic crystals, e.g., NaI, is their hygroscopicity, a property which requires them to be housed in an airtight container to protect them from moisture. CsI(Tl) and BaF2 are only slightly hygroscopic and do not usually need protection. CsF, NaI(Tl), LaCl
3(Ce), LaBr
3(Ce) are hygroscopic, while BGO, CaF
2(Eu), LYSO, and YAG(Ce) are not.
Inorganic crystals can be cut to small sizes and arranged in an array configuration so as to provide position sensitivity. Such arrays are often used in medical physics or security applications to detect X-rays or γ rays: high-Z, high density materials (e.g. LYSO, BGO) are typically preferred for this type of applications.
Scintillation in inorganic crystals is typically slower than in organic ones, ranging typically from 1.48 ns for ZnO(Ga) to ns for CaWO
4. Exceptions are CsF (~5 ns), fast BaF
2 (0.7 ns; the slow component is at 630 ns), as well as the newer products (LaCl
3(Ce), 28 ns; LaBr
3(Ce), 16 ns; LYSO, 41 ns).
For the imaging application, one of the advantage of inorganic crystals is very high light yield. Some high light yield scintillators above 100,000 photons/MeV at 662 keV are very recently reported for LuI
3(Ce), SrI
2(Eu), and Cs
2HfCl
6.
Many semiconductor scintillator phosphors are known, such as ZnS(Ag) (mentioned in the history section), CdS(Ag), ZnO(Zn), ZnO(Ga), CdS(In), ZnSe(O), and ZnTe(O), but none of these are available as single crystals. CdS(Te) and ZnSe(Te) have been commercially available in single crystal form, but their luminosity is partially quenched at room temperature.[19]
GaAs(Si,B) is a recently discovered cryogenic semiconductor scintillator with high light output in the infra-red and apparently no afterglow. In combination with ultra-low noise cryogenic photodetectors it is the target in experiments to detect rare, low-energy electronic excitations from interacting dark matter.[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]
EBO Product Page
Explore more:5 Reasons Why Your Business Needs Yiyuan Mechanical Parts?
Gaseous scintillators
[edit]Why is Trunnion Ball Valve Factory Better?
Gaseous scintillators consist of nitrogen and the noble gases helium, argon, krypton, and xenon, with helium and xenon receiving the most attention. The scintillation process is due to the de-excitation of single atoms excited by the passage of an incoming particle. This de-excitation is very rapid (~1 ns), so the detector response is quite fast. Coating the walls of the container with a wavelength shifter is generally necessary as those gases typically emit in the ultraviolet and PMTs respond better to the visible blue-green region. In nuclear physics, gaseous detectors have been used to detect fission fragments or heavy charged particles.
Glasses
[edit]The most common glass scintillators are cerium-activated lithium or boron silicates. Since both lithium and boron have large neutron cross-sections, glass detectors are particularly well suited to the detection of thermal (slow) neutrons. Lithium is more widely used than boron since it has a greater energy release on capturing a neutron and therefore greater light output. Glass scintillators are however sensitive to electrons and γ rays as well (pulse height discrimination can be used for particle identification). Being very robust, they are also well-suited to harsh environmental conditions. Their response time is ≈10 ns, their light output is however low, typically ≈30% of that of anthracene.
Solution-based perovskite scintillators
[edit]Scintillation properties of organic-inorganic methylamonium (MA) lead halide perovskites under proton irradiation were first reported by Shibuya et al. in and the first γ-ray pulse height spectrum, although still with poor energy resolution, was reported on ((C
6H
5(CH
2)
2NH
3)
2PbBr
4) by van Eijk et al. in . Birowosuto at al. studied the scintillation properties of 3-D and 2-D layered perovskites under X-ray excitation. MAPbBr3 (CH
3NH
3PbBr
3) emits at 550 nm and MAPbI3 (CH
3NH
3PbI
3) at 750 nm which is attributed to exciton emission near the band gap of the compounds. In this first generation of Pb-halide perovskites the emission is strongly quenched at room temperature and less than 1 000 ph/MeV survive. At 10 K however intense emission is observed and write about yields up to 200 000 ph/MeV. The quenching is attributed to the small e-h binding energy in the exciton that decreases for Cl to Br to I . Interestingly one may replace the organic MA group with Cs+ to obtain full inorganic CsPbX3 halide perovskites. Depending on the Cl, Br, I content the triplet X-ray excited exciton emission can be tuned from 430 nm to 700 nm . One may also dilute Cs with Rb to obtain similar tuning.
Above very recent developments demonstrate that the organic-inorganic and all inorganic Pb-halide perovskites have various interesting scintillation properties. However, the recent two-dimensional perovskite single crystals with light yields between 10 000 and 40 000 ph/MeV and decay times below 10 ns at room temperature will be more favorable as they may have much larger Stokes shift up to 200 nm in comparison with CsPbBr3 quantum dot scintillators and this is essential to prevent self reabsorption for scintillators.
More recently, a new material class first reported by Professor Biwu Ma's research group, called 0D organic metal halide hybrid (OMHH), an extension of the perovskite materials. This class of materials exhibits strong exciton binding of hundreds of meV, resulting in their high photoluminescent quantum efficiency of almost unity. Their large stoke shift and reabsorption-free properties make them desirable. Their potential applications for scintillators have been reported by the same group, and others. In ,(C38H34P2)MnBr4 was reported to have a light yield up to 80 000 Photon/MeV despite its low Z compared to traditional all inorganic. Impressive light yields from other 0D OMHH have been reported. There is a great potential to realize new generation scintillators from this material class. However, they are limited by their relatively long response time in microseconds, which is an area of intense research.
Physics of scintillation
[edit]Organic scintillators
[edit]Transitions made by the free valence electrons of the molecules are responsible for the production of scintillation light in organic crystals. These electrons are associated with the whole molecule rather than any particular atom and occupy the so-called -molecular orbitals. The ground state S0 is a singlet state above which are the excited singlet states (S*, S**, ...), the lowest triplet state (T0), and its excited levels (T*, T**, ...). A fine structure corresponding to molecular vibrational modes is associated with each of those electron levels. The energy spacing between electron levels is ≈1 eV; the spacing between the vibrational levels is about 1/10 of that for electron levels.
An incoming particle can excite either an electron level or a vibrational level. The singlet excitations immediately decay (< 10 ps) to the S* state without the emission of radiation (internal degradation). The S* state then decays to the ground state S0 (typically to one of the vibrational levels above S0) by emitting a scintillation photon. This is the prompt component or fluorescence. The transparency of the scintillator to the emitted photon is due to the fact that the energy of the photon is less than that required for an S0 → S* transition (the transition is usually being to a vibrational level above S0).[clarification needed]
When one of the triplet states gets excited, it immediately decays to the T0 state with no emission of radiation (internal degradation). Since the T0 → S0 transition is very improbable, the T0 state instead decays by interacting with another T0 molecule:
T 0 + T 0 → S ∗ + S 0 + photons {\displaystyle T_{0}+T_{0}\rightarrow S^{*}+S_{0}+{\text{photons}}}
and leaves one of the molecules in the S* state, which then decays to S0 with the release of a scintillation photon. Since the T0-T0 interaction takes time, the scintillation light is delayed: this is the slow or delayed component (corresponding to delayed fluorescence). Sometimes, a direct T0 → S0 transition occurs (also delayed), and corresponds to the phenomenon of phosphorescence. Note that the observational difference between delayed-fluorescence and phosphorescence is the difference in the wavelengths of the emitted optical photon in an S* → S0 transition versus a T0 → S0 transition.
Organic scintillators can be dissolved in an organic solvent to form either a liquid or plastic scintillator. The scintillation process is the same as described for organic crystals (above); what differs is the mechanism of energy absorption: energy is first absorbed by the solvent, then passed onto the scintillation solute (the details of the transfer are not clearly understood).
Inorganic scintillators
[edit]The scintillation process in inorganic materials is due to the electronic band structure found in crystals and is not molecular in nature as is the case with organic scintillators. An incoming particle can excite an electron from the valence band to either the conduction band or the exciton band (located just below the conduction band and separated from the valence band by an energy gap; see picture). This leaves an associated hole behind, in the valence band. Impurities create electronic levels in the forbidden gap. The excitons are loosely bound electron-hole pairs which wander through the crystal lattice until they are captured as a whole by impurity centers.
The latter then rapidly de-excite by emitting scintillation light (fast component). The activator impurities are typically chosen so that the emitted light is in the visible range or near-UV where photomultipliers are effective. The holes associated with electrons in the conduction band are independent from the latter. Those holes and electrons are captured successively by impurity centers exciting certain metastable states not accessible to the excitons. The delayed de-excitation of those metastable impurity states again results in scintillation light (slow component).
BGO (bismuth germanium oxide) is a pure inorganic scintillator without any activator impurity. There, the scintillation process is due to an optical transition of the Bi3+
ion, a major constituent of the crystal. In tungstate scintillators CaWO
4 and CdWO
4 the emission is due to radiative decay of self-trapped excitons.
The scintillation process in GaAs doped with silicon and boron impurities is different from conventional scintillators in that the silicon n-type doping provides a built-in population of delocalized electrons at the bottom of the conduction band.[38] Some of the boron impurity atoms reside on arsenic sites and serve as acceptors.[39] A scintillation photon is produced whenever an acceptor atom such as boron captures an ionization hole from the valence band and that hole recombines radiatively with one of the delocalized electrons.[40]
Unlike many other semiconductors, the delocalized electrons provided by the silicon are not “frozen out” at cryogenic temperatures. Above the Mott transition concentration of 8× free carriers per cm3, the “metallic” state is maintained at cryogenic temperatures because mutual repulsion drives any additional electrons into the next higher available energy level, which is in the conduction band.[41] The spectrum of photons from this process is centered at 930 nm (1.33 eV) and there are three other emission bands centered at 860, , and nm from other minor processes.[42] Each of these emission bands has a different luminosity and decay time.[43] The high scintillation luminosity is surprising because (1) with a refractive index of about 3.5, escape is inhibited by total internal reflection and (2) experiments at 90K report narrow-beam infrared absorption coefficients of several per cm.[44][45][46]
Recent Monte Carlo and Feynman path integral calculations have shown that the high luminosity could be explained if most of the narrow beam absorption is actually a novel optical scattering from the conduction electrons with a cross section of about 5 x 10−18 cm2 that allows scintillation photons to escape total internal reflection.[47][48] This cross section is about 107 times larger than Thomson scattering but comparable to the optical cross section of the conduction electrons in a metal mirror.
Gases
[edit]In gases, the scintillation process is due to the de-excitation of single atoms excited by the passage of an incoming particle (a very rapid process: ≈1 ns).
Response to various radiations
[edit]Heavy ions
[edit]Scintillation counters are usually not ideal for the detection of heavy ions for three reasons:
- The very high ionizing power of heavy ions induces quenching effects which result in a reduced light output (e.g. for equal energies, a proton will produce 1/4 to 1/2 the light of an electron, while alphas will produce only about 1/10 the light);
- The high stopping power of the particles also results in a reduction of the fast component relative to the slow component, increasing detector dead-time;
- Strong non-linearities are observed in the detector response especially at lower energies.
The reduction in light output is stronger for organics than for inorganic crystals. Therefore, where needed, inorganic crystals, e.g. CsI(Tl), ZnS(Ag) (typically used in thin sheets as α-particle monitors), CaF
2(Eu), should be preferred to organic materials. Typical applications are α-survey instruments, dosimetry instruments, and heavy ion dE/dx detectors. Gaseous scintillators have also been used in nuclear physics experiments.
Electrons
[edit]The detection efficiency for electrons is essentially 100% for most scintillators. But because electrons can make large angle scatterings (sometimes backscatterings), they can exit the detector without depositing their full energy in it. The back-scattering is a rapidly increasing function of the atomic number Z of the scintillator material. Organic scintillators, having a lower Z than inorganic crystals, are therefore best suited for the detection of low-energy (< 10 MeV) beta particles. The situation is different for high energy electrons: since they mostly lose their energy by bremsstrahlung at the higher energies, a higher-Z material is better suited for the detection of the bremsstrahlung photon and the production of the electromagnetic shower which it can induce.
Gamma rays
[edit] See also: Gamma ray § Matter interactionHigh-Z materials, e.g. inorganic crystals, are best suited for the detection of gamma rays. The three basic ways that a gamma ray interacts with matter are: the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production. The photon is completely absorbed in photoelectric effect and pair production, while only partial energy is deposited in any given Compton scattering. The cross section for the photoelectric process is proportional to Z5, that for pair production proportional to Z2, whereas Compton scattering goes roughly as Z. A high-Z material therefore favors the former two processes, enabling the detection of the full energy of the gamma ray. If the gamma rays are at higher energies (>5 MeV), pair production dominates.
Neutrons
[edit]Since the neutron is not charged it does not interact via the Coulomb force and therefore does not ionize the scintillation material. It must first transfer some or all of its energy via the strong force to a charged atomic nucleus. The positively charged nucleus then produces ionization. Fast neutrons (generally >0.5 MeV ) primarily rely on the recoil proton in (n,p) reactions; materials rich in hydrogen, e.g. plastic scintillators, are therefore best suited for their detection. Slow neutrons rely on nuclear reactions such as the (n,γ) or (n,α) reactions, to produce ionization. Their mean free path is therefore quite large unless the scintillator material contains nuclides having a high cross section for these nuclear reactions such as 6Li or 10B. Materials such as LiI(Eu) or glass silicates are therefore particularly well-suited for the detection of slow (thermal) neutrons.
List of inorganic scintillators
[edit]The following is a list of commonly used inorganic crystals:
- BaF
2 or barium fluoride: BaF
2 contains a very fast and a slow component. The fast scintillation light is emitted in the UV band (220 nm) and has a 0.7 ns decay time (smallest decay time for any scintillator), while the slow scintillation light is emitted at longer wavelengths (310 nm) and has a 630 ns decay time. It is used for fast timing applications, as well as applications for which pulse shape discrimination is needed. The light yield of BaF
2 is about 12 photons/keV.[52] BaF
2 is not hygroscopic. - BGO or bismuth germanate: bismuth germanate has a higher stopping power, but a lower optical yield than NaI(Tl). It is often used in coincidence detectors for detecting back-to-back gamma rays emitted upon positron annihilation in positron emission tomography machines.
- CdWO
4 or cadmium tungstate: a high density, high atomic number scintillator with a very long decay time (14 μs), and relatively high light output (about 1/3 of that of NaI(Tl)). CdWO
4 is routinely used for X-ray detection (CT scanners). Having very little 228Th and 226Ra contamination, it is also suitable for low activity counting applications. - CaF
2(Eu) or calcium fluoride doped with europium: The material is not hygroscopic, has a 940 ns decay time, and is relatively low-Z. The latter property makes it ideal for detection of low energy β particles because of low backscattering, but not very suitable for γ detection. Thin layers of CaF
2(Eu) have also been used with a thicker slab of NaI(Tl) to make phoswiches capable of discriminating between α, β, and γ particles. - CaWO
4 or calcium tungstate: exhibits long decay time 9 μs and short wavelength emission with maximum at 420 nm matching sensitivity curve of bi‑alkali PMT. The light yield and energy resolution of the scintillator (6.6% for 137Cs) is comparable with that of CdWO
4. - CsI: undoped cesium iodide emits predominantly at 315 nm, is only slightly hygroscopic, and has a very short decay time (16 ns), making it suitable for fast timing applications. The light output is quite low at room temperature, however, it significantly increases with cooling.
- CsI(Na) or cesium iodide doped with sodium: the crystal is less bright than CsI(Tl), but comparable in light output to NaI(Tl). The wavelength of maximum emission is at 420 nm, well matched to the photocathode sensitivity of bi‑alkali PMTs. It has a slightly shorter decay time than CsI(Tl) (630 ns versus ns for CsI(Tl)). CsI(Na) is hygroscopic and needs an airtight enclosure for protection against moisture.
- CsI(Tl) or cesium iodide doped with thallium: these crystals are one of the brightest scintillators. Its maximum wavelength of light emission is in the green region at 550 nm. CsI(Tl) is only slightly hygroscopic and does not usually require an airtight enclosure.
- GaAs or gallium arsenide (suitably doped with silicon and boron impurities) is a cryogenic n-type semiconductor scintillator with a low cryogenic bandgap (1.52 eV) and high light output (100 photons/keV) in the infra-red (930 nm). The absence of thermally stimulated luminescence is evidence for the absence of afterglow, which makes it attractive for detecting rare, low energy electronic excitations from interacting dark matter. Large (5 kg) high-quality crystals are commercially grown for electronic applications.
- Gd
2O
2S or gadolinium oxysulfide has a high stopping power due to its relatively high density (7.32 g/cm3) and the high atomic number of gadolinium. The light output is also good, making it useful as a scintillator for x-ray imaging applications. - LaBr
3(Ce) (or lanthanum bromide doped with cerium): a better (novel) alternative to NaI(Tl); denser, more efficient, much faster (having a decay time about ~20ns), offers superior energy resolution due to its very high light output. Moreover, the light output is very stable and quite high over a very wide range of temperatures, making it particularly attractive for high temperature applications. Depending on the application, the intrinsic activity of 138La can be a disadvantage. LaBr
3(Ce) is very hygroscopic. - LaCl
3(Ce) (or lanthanum chloride doped with cerium): very fast, high light output. LaCl
3(Ce) is a cheaper alternative to LaBr
3(Ce). It is also quite hygroscopic. - PbWO
4 or lead tungstate: due to its high-Z, PbWO
4 is suitable for applications where a high stopping power is required (e.g. γ ray detection). - LuI
3 or lutetium iodide. - LSO or lutetium oxyorthosilicate (Lu
2SiO
5): used in positron emission tomography because it exhibits properties similar to bismuth germanate (BGO), but with a higher light yield. Its only disadvantage is the intrinsic background from the beta decay of natural 176Lu. - LYSO (Lu
1.8Y
0.2SiO
5(Ce)): comparable in density to BGO, but much faster and with much higher light output; excellent for medical imaging applications. LYSO is non-hygroscopic. - NaI(Tl) or sodium iodide doped with thallium: NaI(Tl) is by far the most widely used scintillator material. It is available in single crystal form or the more rugged polycrystalline form (used in high vibration environments, e.g. wireline logging in the oil industry). Other applications include nuclear medicine, basic research, environmental monitoring, and aerial surveys. NaI(Tl) is very hygroscopic and needs to be housed in an airtight enclosure.
- YAG(Ce) or yttrium aluminum garnet: YAG(Ce) is non-hygroscopic. The wavelength of maximum emission is at 550 nm, well-matched to red-resistive PMTs or photo-diodes. It is relatively fast (70 ns decay time). Its light output is about 1/3 of that of NaI(Tl). The material exhibits some properties that make it particularly attractive for electron microscopy applications (e.g. high electron conversion efficiency, good resolution, mechanical ruggedness and long lifetime).
- ZnS(Ag) or zinc sulfide: ZnS(Ag) is one of the older inorganic scintillators (the first experiment making use of a scintillator by Sir William Crookes () involved a ZnS screen). It is only available as a polycrystalline powder, however. Its use is therefore limited to thin screens used primarily for α particle detection.
- ZnWO
4 or zinc tungstate is similar to CdWO
4 scintillator exhibiting long decay constant 25 μs and slightly lower light yield.
See also
[edit]- Gamma spectroscopy
- Liquid scintillation counting
- Scintillation counter
- Scintillating bolometer
- Neutron detection
- Total absorption spectroscopy
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]USB2 - Prismatoid light guide - Google Patents
USB2 - Prismatoid light guide - Google Patents
Prismatoid light guide Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USB2 USB2 US17/417,552 USA USB2 US B2 US B2 US B2 US A US A US A US B2 US B2 US B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- scintillator
- pair
- prismatoid
- scintillators
- detector
- Prior art date
- -01-08
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires -07-15
Links
- USPTO
- USPTO PatentCenter
- USPTO Assignment
- Espacenet
- Global Dossier
- Discuss
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computed tomography [CT]
- A61B6/037—Emission tomography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/29—Measurement performed on radiation beams, e.g. position or section of the beam; Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
- G01T1/—Measurement of spatial distribution of radiation
- G01T1/—In depth localisation, e.g. using positron emitters; Tomographic imaging (longitudinal and transverse section imaging; apparatus for radiation diagnosis sequentially in different planes, steroscopic radiation diagnosis)
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/161—Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
- G01T1/164—Scintigraphy
- G01T1/—Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
- G01T1/—Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras using a scintillation crystal and position sensing photodetector arrays, e.g. ANGER cameras
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/161—Applications in the field of nuclear medicine, e.g. in vivo counting
- G01T1/164—Scintigraphy
- G01T1/—Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras
- G01T1/—Static instruments for imaging the distribution of radioactivity in one or two dimensions using one or several scintillating elements; Radio-isotope cameras using an array of optically separate scintillation elements permitting direct location of scintillations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/20—Measuring radiation intensity with scintillation detectors
- G01T1/—Optical details, e.g. reflecting or diffusing layers
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to the field of radiation imaging and, in particular, to positron emission tomography (PET).
- PET positron emission tomography
- PET is a nuclear medical imaging modality that produces three-dimensional (3D) images to see functional processes in a living organism. PET is commonly used in clinical oncology for detecting cancer and for clinical diagnosis of heart problems and/or brain disorders. After being introduced into the organism, positron-emitting radionuclides decay with each annihilation, emitting two photons in diametrically opposing directions. Time of flight (TOF) measurements may be utilized to measure the time for the electromagnetic wave to travel a distance through a medium. A TOF PET system detects the photons, and uses TOF information to determine if two registered photons are in time coincidence, i.e., belong to a same positron annihilation event.
- TOF Time of flight
- the TOF PET system uses an arrival time difference to localize each annihilation event. Without the TOF localization data, computationally expensive iterative reconstruction algorithms are used to estimate the 3D distribution of events that provide the best match with the measured projection data. Modern PET readout is performed with silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) due to their speed and magnetic resonance compatibility.
- SiPMs silicon photomultipliers
- DOI readout is traditionally performed with a double-sided readout using two readout arrays per scintillator array.
- the double-sided readout requires double electronics compared to a regular PET system. Therefore, recent research has focused on the development of single-sided readout techniques, which only requires one scintillator and one readout array. Multiple scintillator crystals are typically coupled to single readout pixels to reduce system cost, although 1:1 coupling can also be used.
- DOI techniques use substantially flat reflective light guides at the top of the scintillator array to redirect light to other readout pixels. In doing so, DOI information can be gained by detection of a fraction of the maximum light absorbed on a single SiPM pixel and the detected fraction to the total light absorbed across all pixels of an array for a single gamma ray interaction event. Only two different readout pixels are required to make this measurement. However, having more pixels is useful to improve the DOI resolution.
- Anger logic schemes are traditionally employed to improve the overall detector system resolution by localizing gamma ray interaction down to the crystal level via centroiding. Because of poor light sharing of conventional uniform light guides, Anger logic localization on the periphery of the detector array is severely degraded compared to that of centralized crystals and detectors since peripheral crystals have fewer crystals and pixels for sharing.
- a system and method for improved light sharing between scintillator crystals in PET detector systems overcomes the shortcomings of conventional DOI readout systems and methods, provides improved DOI resolution and more uniform Anger logic localization performance across entire detector arrays.
- An aspect of the present invention provides a device for detecting sub-atomic particles, the device including a plurality of scintillators, at least one detector provided on a first end of the scintillator, and a prismatoid provided on a second end of the scintillator, with the prismatoid configured to redirect light between a first pair of adjacent scintillators of the plurality of scintillators.
- An aspect of the present disclosure provides a prismatoid that includes a reflective surface configured to redirect travel of at least one photon emitted from at least one scintillator of a pair of scintillators adjacent to the reflective surface, with the travel of the at least one photon being redirected from the at least one scintillator of a first pair of scintillators toward another scintillator of the first pair of scintillators.
- a further aspect of the present disclosure provides a system for non-invasive medical imaging that includes at least one prismatoid, at least one detector, and a scintillator array.
- the at least one prismatoid redirects light between adjacent scintillators of scintillator array.
- the at least one detector is provided on an end of the scintillator array opposite the at least one prismatoid, and the prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one truncated pyramid, and at least one portion of a sphere.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 3 is a cut away profile view of a prismatoid light guide positioned on a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 4 is a top view of a prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIGS. 5 a - 5 c are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a second prismatoid, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIGS. 7 a and 7 b are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 8 a illustrates a prismatoid light guide array disassembled from a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 8 b illustrates a scintillator array disassembled from a prismatoid light guide array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 9 ( a ) illustrates light sharing of a conventional planar light guide
- FIG. 9 ( b ) illustrates light sharing of a prismatoid, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 10 provides simulated illuminance maps for a conventional planar light guide
- FIG. 11 provides simulated illuminance maps according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 12 is a graph of percent light-sharing across neighboring silicon photomultipliers detectors comparing the percentage light sharing of conventional planar glass with the prismatoid light guide according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the prismatoid light guide 100 of FIG. 1 is positioned on the scintillator array 200 , with a detector 300 positioned on a side opposite the prismatoid light guide 100 .
- the prismatoid light guide 100 includes a plurality of first prismatoids 410 , which may be triangular shaped, and which may be surrounded by second prismatoids 420 and corner prismatoids, details of which are provided herein.
- the prism light guide 100 may be fixedly provided or removably provided on the scintillator array 120 .
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide 100 .
- the plurality of first prismatoids 410 may be substantially pyramid shaped.
- the first prismatoids 410 , the second prismatoids 420 and the third prismatoids may be substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one a truncated pyramid, and at least one a portion of a sphere.
- FIG. 3 is a cut away profile view illustrating a geometric arrangement of a center portion of the prismatoid light guide 100 positioned on a scintillator array 200 , according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the prismatoid may be substantially shaped as a pyramid with three sides 120 a , 120 b , 120 c .
- the prismatoid light guide 100 may be positioned on or adjacent to a first end 211 d , i.e., a first end face, of the scintillator array 200 .
- the prismatoid light guide 100 operates as a reflector that enhances light sharing and provides at least 4:1 coupling between scintillators 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 .
- the prismatoid light guide 100 includes at least one reflective surface, e.g., an interior surface of sides 120 a , 120 b , that redirects travel of at least one sub-atomic particle, e.g., a photon, emitted from at least one scintillator of a first pair of adjacent scintillators.
- the interior surface of sides 120 a , 120 b may be coated with Barium Sulfate, epoxy or provided with an enhanced specular reflector (ESR) insert for improved reflectivity along lateral face thereof.
- ESR enhanced specular reflector
- Each scintillator of the scintillator pair of scintillators may be a scintillator crystal, configured to convert high energy x-rays, gamma rays and similar high energy particles into optical light and/or photons, as known in the art.
- the change of travel direction is from the at least one scintillator that emits the at least one sub-atomic particle towards at least one other scintillator of the at least four adjacent scintillators.
- the provided coupling enhances detection by silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) pixels 380 a , 380 b , 380 c . . . 380 i of detector 300 , positioned at a second end 211 b .
- the SiPM pixels 380 a The SiPM pixels 380 a .
- detector 300 communicates with at least one processor, which controls a display or other output of the at least one photon that is detected by the detector 300 , to provide a single-sided readout high resolution of depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout in a positron emission tomography (PET) detector.
- DOI depth-of-interaction
- Each scintillator 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 may include a first interior side 211 a , 212 a and a second interior side 211 c , 212 c .
- the second interior side 211 c , 212 c may be substantially parallel with the respective first interior side 211 a , 212 a , and the first interior side 211 a , 212 a and the second interior side 211 c , 212 c run substantially from the first end 211 d to the second end 211 b , thereby providing an interior light guide 211 g , 212 g between each respective first side 211 a , 212 a and second side 211 c , 212 c configured to reflect light therebetween, for transmitting substantially all of the light from respective prismatoids 120 of the prism light guide 100 to respective detectors 300 .
- the interior light guide reflects substantially all light within respective scintillators 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 traveling from respective prismatoids 120 to respective detectors 130 .
- the prismatoid 120 redirects light from the light guide of a first scintillator to the light guide of adjacent scintillators, and light sharing is self-contained within scintillation crystals coupled to the prismatoid 120 .
- the prismatoid 120 provides stabilized light guide geometry at the first end face 211 d of the scintillator array 100 .
- the prismatoid light guide 100 reflects light, without functioning as a high-energy photon detector.
- the scintillators 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 may be coupled in a 4:1 ratio for photon detection by a shared SiPM pixel, e.g., SiPM pixel 380 a and SiPM pixel 380 b being shared by scintillators 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 via prismatoid 120 of prismatoid light guide 100 .
- At least two SiPM pixels 380 a , 380 b of the detector 300 are coupled to a respective prismatoid 120 via scintillator crystals 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , to enable differential single-sided readout for DOI capabilities.
- FIGS. 3 , 4 , 8 a and 8 b illustrate a 1:4 scintillator-to-readout coupling ratio.
- Prismatoid 120 may be coupled to one end of crystals 211 , 212 , 213 , 214
- SiPM pixels 380 a , 380 b may be coupled to an opposite end.
- prismatoid 120 is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one a truncated pyramid, and at least one a portion of a sphere.
- FIG. 4 is a top view of the prismatoid light guide 100 , with locations of varied prismatoid geometries to introduce more uniformly directed light sharing along edges of the scintillator array 200 .
- the geometry of the prismatoid array allows for coupling of each non-peripheral prismatoid to four SiPM pixels of detector 300 and improved controlled light sharing.
- FIG. 4 illustrates scintillators 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 sharing a common detector 300 .
- Scintillators 211 and 212 may also be provided as a first pair of adjacent scintillators, and scintillators 213 , 214 may be provided as a second pair of adjacent scintillators, with the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators adjacent to a first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators sharing a first detector of a plurality of detectors with the first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators.
- the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators may be adjacent to a second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators may share a second detector of the plurality of detectors with the second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators.
- the prismatoid may redirect light from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators to at least one of the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators, the first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators.
- the controlled light sharing of the present disclosure increases system-level count rate.
- each scintillation event requires readout from all SiPM pixels to calculate the DOI and perform centroiding, since light is expected to be shared across all scintillators.
- the prismatoid light guide of the present disclosure provides precise identification of which scintillator columns will share light with each other. Scintillators will only share light with columns coupled to a same prismatoid.
- each non-peripheral prismatoid is coupled to at least four scintillators, which belong to anywhere from at least two to four SiPM pixels depending on the detector array geometry.
- FIGS. 5 a - 5 c are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5 a is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in a substantially pyramid shape.
- FIG. 5 b is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in shape that combines a substantially pyramid shape with a substantially cuboid shape.
- FIG. 5 c is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in a substantially triangular shape.
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a second prismatoid 420 .
- the second prismatoid 420 has a substantially triangular shape.
- FIGS. 7 a and 7 b are perspective views of prismatoids 430 .
- FIG. 7 a illustrates a corner prismatoid that includes substantially cuboid shapes 435 , 436 , upon which substantially triangular shapes 432 , 433 are respectively affixed.
- the cuboid shapes 435 , 436 may also be monolithically formed on triangular shapes 432 , 433 .
- FIG. 7 b illustrates a corner prismatoid that includes substantially cuboid shapes 430 a , 430 b , upon which substantially triangular shapes 430 c , 430 d are respectively affixed.
- Arrangement of the first prismatoid 410 , the third prismatoid 420 and the third prismatoid 430 is provided in FIGS. 2 - 4 .
- FIG. 8 a illustrates a prismatoid light guide array disassembled from a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 8 b illustrates a scintillator array disassembled from a prismatoid light guide array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Assembly of the prismatoid light guide array 100 of FIG. 8 a onto the scintillator array 200 of FIG. 8 b provides a 4:1 scintillator to prismatoid ratio.
- the prismatoid light guide array 100 and the scintillator array 200 may also be monolithically provided.
- FIG. 9 ( a ) illustrates light sharing of a conventional planar light guide.
- FIG. 9 ( b ) illustrates light sharing of a prismatoid light guide according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIGS. 9 ( a ) and 9 ( b ) are obtained by Monte Carlo simulation.
- FIGS. 9 A and 9 B provide flood histograms at the upper portion thereof and one dimensional histograms of gamma ray interaction localization in the x-direction representative of crystal identification quality at the lower portion thereof.
- FIG. 9 A illustrates non-uniform scintillator column identification with the uniform glass light guide using Anger logic centroiding due to edge and corner effects.
- FIG. 9 b illustrates elimination of edge and corner effects due to improved light sharing patterns, thereby enabling uniform scintillator column identification throughout the detector array in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure.
- Comparison of the ray traces of FIG. 9 ( a ) with the ray traces of FIG. 9 ( b ) show improved sharing of light with neighboring scintillator column provided by prismatoid light guide 100 .
- the prismatoid redirects light into neighboring scintillators and SiPM pixels, thus enabling more accurate DOI readout due to enhanced light sharing between neighboring scintillators.
- FIG. 10 provides simulated illuminance maps for a conventional planar light guide.
- FIG. 11 are simulated illuminance maps according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the illuminance maps of FIGS. 10 and 11 are heatmaps of photon flux on respective SiPM pixels.
- the light sharing of the gamma ray interaction takes is greatly enhanced with adjacent SiPM pixels, as well as the SiPM pixels diagonally across from the original readout pixel.
- FIG. 12 is a graph of percent light-sharing across neighboring SiPM detectors comparing percentage light sharing of conventional planar glass with the prismatoid light guide.
- the prismatoid light guide 100 provides significantly improved light sharing for all interaction depths, with the improvement increasing as a function of interaction depth, illustrating enhanced DOI localization accuracy, which in turn provides improved DOI resolution and spatial resolution of PET detector systems.
- a method of fabrication includes affixing the prismatoid light guide onto one end of a scintillator, which may be provided as a block of scintillator crystals, with the detector module affixed to an opposite end of the scintillator.
- the prismatoid 120 may be deposited on the one end of the scintillator array by sputtering.
- the prismatoid may also be removably attached to the one end of the scintillator.
- the scintillators may be polished and then de-polished along lateral faces thereof to introduce roughness and improve DOI resolution by creating differential light sharing along the lateral faces as a function of gamma ray interaction depth.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine (AREA)
Abstract
Provided area device for detecting sub-atomic particles and method of fabrication thereof. The device includes a plurality of scintillators, a detector provided on a first end of the plurality of scintillators and a prismatoid provided on a second end of the plurality of scintillators. The prismatoid redirects light between adjacent scintillators of the plurality of scintillators.Description
PRIORITY This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Applications No. 62/789,559 and 62/957,991 filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, and Jan. 7, , respectively, the entire contents of each which is incorporated herein by reference. GOVERNMENT SUPPORT This invention was made with government support under grant number EB awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to the field of radiation imaging and, in particular, to positron emission tomography (PET). 2. Description of the Related Art PET is a nuclear medical imaging modality that produces three-dimensional (3D) images to see functional processes in a living organism. PET is commonly used in clinical oncology for detecting cancer and for clinical diagnosis of heart problems and/or brain disorders. After being introduced into the organism, positron-emitting radionuclides decay with each annihilation, emitting two photons in diametrically opposing directions. Time of flight (TOF) measurements may be utilized to measure the time for the electromagnetic wave to travel a distance through a medium. A TOF PET system detects the photons, and uses TOF information to determine if two registered photons are in time coincidence, i.e., belong to a same positron annihilation event. The TOF PET system uses an arrival time difference to localize each annihilation event. Without the TOF localization data, computationally expensive iterative reconstruction algorithms are used to estimate the 3D distribution of events that provide the best match with the measured projection data. Modern PET readout is performed with silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) due to their speed and magnetic resonance compatibility. High depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution is needed in PET scintillators to reduce parallax error and the resulting spatial blur, which is especially prominent in detection system with small ring diameters, such as single-organ inserts. DOI readout is traditionally performed with a double-sided readout using two readout arrays per scintillator array. However, the double-sided readout requires double electronics compared to a regular PET system. Therefore, recent research has focused on the development of single-sided readout techniques, which only requires one scintillator and one readout array. Multiple scintillator crystals are typically coupled to single readout pixels to reduce system cost, although 1:1 coupling can also be used. Modern DOI techniques use substantially flat reflective light guides at the top of the scintillator array to redirect light to other readout pixels. In doing so, DOI information can be gained by detection of a fraction of the maximum light absorbed on a single SiPM pixel and the detected fraction to the total light absorbed across all pixels of an array for a single gamma ray interaction event. Only two different readout pixels are required to make this measurement. However, having more pixels is useful to improve the DOI resolution. Conventional light guide geometry uses a flat, uniform reflective material, which primarily directs light back into the original scintillation crystal that gamma ray absorption took place in, rather than redirecting the light to other crystals and readout pixels. This results in suboptimal DOI resolution since most of the light is not being shared with other pixels, which is required to make DOI measurements, thus making single-sided DOI readout ineffective. Current single-sided DOI readout with high aspect ratio scintillators (˜15-20 mm thick) and uniform light guides are only able to achieve ˜5 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) DOI resolution. In contrast, double-sided readout can achieve DOI resolution on the order of 1 mm FWHM, leaving much room for improvement of single-sided techniques before they become feasible to use in practice. Conventional systems and methods fail to provide impactful light sharing techniques in PET detector systems. Anger logic schemes are traditionally employed to improve the overall detector system resolution by localizing gamma ray interaction down to the crystal level via centroiding. Because of poor light sharing of conventional uniform light guides, Anger logic localization on the periphery of the detector array is severely degraded compared to that of centralized crystals and detectors since peripheral crystals have fewer crystals and pixels for sharing. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION To overcome shortcomings of conventional systems, provided herein are a system and method for improved light sharing between scintillator crystals in PET detector systems. The present disclosure overcomes the shortcomings of conventional DOI readout systems and methods, provides improved DOI resolution and more uniform Anger logic localization performance across entire detector arrays. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention address the above problems and disadvantages and provide the advantages described below. An aspect of the present invention provides a device for detecting sub-atomic particles, the device including a plurality of scintillators, at least one detector provided on a first end of the scintillator, and a prismatoid provided on a second end of the scintillator, with the prismatoid configured to redirect light between a first pair of adjacent scintillators of the plurality of scintillators. An aspect of the present disclosure provides a prismatoid that includes a reflective surface configured to redirect travel of at least one photon emitted from at least one scintillator of a pair of scintillators adjacent to the reflective surface, with the travel of the at least one photon being redirected from the at least one scintillator of a first pair of scintillators toward another scintillator of the first pair of scintillators. A further aspect of the present disclosure provides a system for non-invasive medical imaging that includes at least one prismatoid, at least one detector, and a scintillator array. The at least one prismatoid redirects light between adjacent scintillators of scintillator array. The at least one detector is provided on an end of the scintillator array opposite the at least one prismatoid, and the prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one truncated pyramid, and at least one portion of a sphere. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The above and other aspects, features and advantages of certain embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 3 is a cut away profile view of a prismatoid light guide positioned on a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 4 is a top view of a prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIGS. 5 a-5 c are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure; FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a second prismatoid, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIGS. 7 a and 7 b are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure; FIG. 8 a illustrates a prismatoid light guide array disassembled from a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 8 b illustrates a scintillator array disassembled from a prismatoid light guide array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 9(a) illustrates light sharing of a conventional planar light guide; FIG. 9(b) illustrates light sharing of a prismatoid, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; FIG. 10 provides simulated illuminance maps for a conventional planar light guide; FIG. 11 provides simulated illuminance maps according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and FIG. 12 is a graph of percent light-sharing across neighboring silicon photomultipliers detectors comparing the percentage light sharing of conventional planar glass with the prismatoid light guide according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION The following detailed description of certain embodiments of the present invention will be made with reference to the accompanying drawings. In describing the invention, explanation about related functions or constructions known in the art are omitted for the sake of clarity, to avoid obscuring the invention with unnecessary detail. FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The prismatoid light guide 100 of FIG. 1 is positioned on the scintillator array 200, with a detector 300 positioned on a side opposite the prismatoid light guide 100. As illustrated in FIG. 1 , the prismatoid light guide 100 includes a plurality of first prismatoids 410, which may be triangular shaped, and which may be surrounded by second prismatoids 420 and corner prismatoids, details of which are provided herein. The prism light guide 100 may be fixedly provided or removably provided on the scintillator array 120. FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the prismatoid light guide 100. As illustrated in FIG. 2 , the plurality of first prismatoids 410 may be substantially pyramid shaped. The first prismatoids 410, the second prismatoids 420 and the third prismatoids may be substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one a truncated pyramid, and at least one a portion of a sphere. FIG. 3 is a cut away profile view illustrating a geometric arrangement of a center portion of the prismatoid light guide 100 positioned on a scintillator array 200, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As illustrated in FIG. 3 , the prismatoid may be substantially shaped as a pyramid with three sides 120 a, 120 b, 120 c. The prismatoid light guide 100 may be positioned on or adjacent to a first end 211 d, i.e., a first end face, of the scintillator array 200. The prismatoid light guide 100 operates as a reflector that enhances light sharing and provides at least 4:1 coupling between scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214. The prismatoid light guide 100 includes at least one reflective surface, e.g., an interior surface of sides 120 a, 120 b, that redirects travel of at least one sub-atomic particle, e.g., a photon, emitted from at least one scintillator of a first pair of adjacent scintillators. The interior surface of sides 120 a, 120 b may be coated with Barium Sulfate, epoxy or provided with an enhanced specular reflector (ESR) insert for improved reflectivity along lateral face thereof. Each scintillator of the scintillator pair of scintillators may be a scintillator crystal, configured to convert high energy x-rays, gamma rays and similar high energy particles into optical light and/or photons, as known in the art. The change of travel direction is from the at least one scintillator that emits the at least one sub-atomic particle towards at least one other scintillator of the at least four adjacent scintillators. The provided coupling enhances detection by silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) pixels 380 a, 380 b, 380 c . . . 380 i of detector 300, positioned at a second end 211 b. The SiPM pixels 380 a . . . 380 i of detector 300 communicate with at least one processor, which controls a display or other output of the at least one photon that is detected by the detector 300, to provide a single-sided readout high resolution of depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout in a positron emission tomography (PET) detector. Each scintillator 211, 212, 213, 214 may include a first interior side 211 a, 212 a and a second interior side 211 c, 212 c. The second interior side 211 c, 212 c may be substantially parallel with the respective first interior side 211 a, 212 a, and the first interior side 211 a, 212 a and the second interior side 211 c, 212 c run substantially from the first end 211 d to the second end 211 b, thereby providing an interior light guide 211 g, 212 g between each respective first side 211 a, 212 a and second side 211 c, 212 c configured to reflect light therebetween, for transmitting substantially all of the light from respective prismatoids 120 of the prism light guide 100 to respective detectors 300. The interior light guide reflects substantially all light within respective scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214 traveling from respective prismatoids 120 to respective detectors 130. As illustrated in FIG. 9B, the prismatoid 120 redirects light from the light guide of a first scintillator to the light guide of adjacent scintillators, and light sharing is self-contained within scintillation crystals coupled to the prismatoid 120. The prismatoid 120 provides stabilized light guide geometry at the first end face 211 d of the scintillator array 100. The prismatoid light guide 100 reflects light, without functioning as a high-energy photon detector. As illustrated in FIGS. 3, 4, 8 a and 8 b, the scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214 may be coupled in a 4:1 ratio for photon detection by a shared SiPM pixel, e.g., SiPM pixel 380 a and SiPM pixel 380 b being shared by scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214 via prismatoid 120 of prismatoid light guide 100. At least two SiPM pixels 380 a, 380 b of the detector 300 are coupled to a respective prismatoid 120 via scintillator crystals 211, 212, 213, 214, to enable differential single-sided readout for DOI capabilities. FIGS. 3, 4, 8 a and 8 b illustrate a 1:4 scintillator-to-readout coupling ratio. Prismatoid 120 may be coupled to one end of crystals 211, 212, 213, 214, and SiPM pixels 380 a, 380 b may be coupled to an opposite end. Other coupling ratios can also be used with varied prismatoid geometry, with the prismatoid 120 being substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one a truncated pyramid, and at least one a portion of a sphere. FIG. 4 is a top view of the prismatoid light guide 100, with locations of varied prismatoid geometries to introduce more uniformly directed light sharing along edges of the scintillator array 200. The geometry of the prismatoid array allows for coupling of each non-peripheral prismatoid to four SiPM pixels of detector 300 and improved controlled light sharing. FIG. 4 illustrates scintillators 211, 212, 213, 214 sharing a common detector 300. Scintillators 211 and 212 may also be provided as a first pair of adjacent scintillators, and scintillators 213, 214 may be provided as a second pair of adjacent scintillators, with the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators adjacent to a first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators sharing a first detector of a plurality of detectors with the first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. The second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators may be adjacent to a second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators may share a second detector of the plurality of detectors with the second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. Accordingly, the prismatoid may redirect light from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators to at least one of the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators, the first scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the second scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. The controlled light sharing of the present disclosure increases system-level count rate. In contrast, in a uniform light guide, each scintillation event requires readout from all SiPM pixels to calculate the DOI and perform centroiding, since light is expected to be shared across all scintillators. On the other hand, the prismatoid light guide of the present disclosure provides precise identification of which scintillator columns will share light with each other. Scintillators will only share light with columns coupled to a same prismatoid. As illustrated, each non-peripheral prismatoid is coupled to at least four scintillators, which belong to anywhere from at least two to four SiPM pixels depending on the detector array geometry. As a result, readout is only required for a smaller subset of pixels at a time for each scintillation event, enabling simultaneous readout in other parts of the detector array, thereby increasing the system-level count rate when compared with the count rate of a detector system using a conventional uniform light guide. FIGS. 5 a-5 c are perspective views of prismatoids, according to embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 5 a is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in a substantially pyramid shape. FIG. 5 b is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in shape that combines a substantially pyramid shape with a substantially cuboid shape. FIG. 5 c is a perspective view of a first prismatoid 410 in a substantially triangular shape. FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a second prismatoid 420. The second prismatoid 420 has a substantially triangular shape. FIGS. 7 a and 7 b are perspective views of prismatoids 430. FIG. 7 a illustrates a corner prismatoid that includes substantially cuboid shapes 435, 436, upon which substantially triangular shapes 432, 433 are respectively affixed. The cuboid shapes 435, 436 may also be monolithically formed on triangular shapes 432, 433. FIG. 7 b illustrates a corner prismatoid that includes substantially cuboid shapes 430 a, 430 b, upon which substantially triangular shapes 430 c, 430 d are respectively affixed. Arrangement of the first prismatoid 410, the third prismatoid 420 and the third prismatoid 430 is provided in FIGS. 2-4 . Increased uniformity of Anger logic centroiding resolution throughout the detector array is provided, since light is purposely directed to other pixels. In contrast, in conventional uniform light guides do not specifically couple or purposely direct light to specific other SiPM pixels. Also, conventional uniform light guides introduce edge effects where centroiding resolution decreases drastically along the edges of the scintillator array. In contrast, the configuration of the first prismatoid 410, the second prismatoid 420 and the third prismatoid 430 is completely symmetrical regarding light sharing between scintillators and eliminates edge effects in conventional systems. See, FIGS. 2-4 . FIG. 8 a illustrates a prismatoid light guide array disassembled from a scintillator array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIG. 8 b illustrates a scintillator array disassembled from a prismatoid light guide array, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Assembly of the prismatoid light guide array 100 of FIG. 8 a onto the scintillator array 200 of FIG. 8 b provides a 4:1 scintillator to prismatoid ratio. The prismatoid light guide array 100 and the scintillator array 200 may also be monolithically provided. FIG. 9(a) illustrates light sharing of a conventional planar light guide. FIG. 9(b) illustrates light sharing of a prismatoid light guide according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) are obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. FIGS. 9A and 9B provide flood histograms at the upper portion thereof and one dimensional histograms of gamma ray interaction localization in the x-direction representative of crystal identification quality at the lower portion thereof. FIG. 9A illustrates non-uniform scintillator column identification with the uniform glass light guide using Anger logic centroiding due to edge and corner effects. FIG. 9 b illustrates elimination of edge and corner effects due to improved light sharing patterns, thereby enabling uniform scintillator column identification throughout the detector array in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure. Comparison of the ray traces of FIG. 9(a) with the ray traces of FIG. 9(b) show improved sharing of light with neighboring scintillator column provided by prismatoid light guide 100. As shown in FIG. 9(b), the prismatoid redirects light into neighboring scintillators and SiPM pixels, thus enabling more accurate DOI readout due to enhanced light sharing between neighboring scintillators. FIG. 10 provides simulated illuminance maps for a conventional planar light guide. FIG. 11 are simulated illuminance maps according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. The illuminance maps of FIGS. 10 and 11 are heatmaps of photon flux on respective SiPM pixels. As shown in the conventional planar uniform light guide of FIG. 10 , most light lands in a bottom right corner of the pixel corresponding to the scintillator where the gamma ray interaction took place. However, for DOI readout, a larger portion of the light would ideally be shared with neighboring pixels to gain more information on where exactly in the scintillator the interaction took place. As shown in FIG. 11 , using the same scintillator as in FIG. 10 but replacing the planar uniform light guide with the prismatoid light guide 100, the light sharing of the gamma ray interaction takes is greatly enhanced with adjacent SiPM pixels, as well as the SiPM pixels diagonally across from the original readout pixel. FIG. 12 is a graph of percent light-sharing across neighboring SiPM detectors comparing percentage light sharing of conventional planar glass with the prismatoid light guide. As illustrated in FIG. 12 , the prismatoid light guide 100 provides significantly improved light sharing for all interaction depths, with the improvement increasing as a function of interaction depth, illustrating enhanced DOI localization accuracy, which in turn provides improved DOI resolution and spatial resolution of PET detector systems. A method of fabrication is provided that includes affixing the prismatoid light guide onto one end of a scintillator, which may be provided as a block of scintillator crystals, with the detector module affixed to an opposite end of the scintillator. The prismatoid 120 may be deposited on the one end of the scintillator array by sputtering. The prismatoid may also be removably attached to the one end of the scintillator. The scintillators may be polished and then de-polished along lateral faces thereof to introduce roughness and improve DOI resolution by creating differential light sharing along the lateral faces as a function of gamma ray interaction depth. While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain aspects thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof. No recitation of any claim set forth below is to be construed as a means plus function element without express use of “means for” or “step for.”Claims (20)
What is claimed is: 1. A device for detecting sub-atomic particles, the device comprising: first scintillator; a second scintillator; a third scintillator; a fourth scintillator; at least one detector provided on a first end of the first scintillator; and a prismatoid provided on a second end of each of the first scintillator, the second scintillator, the third scintillator and the fourth scintillator, wherein the prismatoid is configured to redirect light between a first pair of adjacent scintillators of the plurality of scintillators, the first pair of adjacent scintillators including the first scintillator and the second scintillator. 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the prismatoid comprises at least one reflective surface for redirecting travel of at least one sub-atomic particle emitted from at least one of the first scintillator or the second scintillator. 3. The device of claim 2, wherein the first scintillator is scintillator, and wherein the travel of the at least one sub-atomic particle is redirected from the first scintillator toward the second scintillator. 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid; at least one truncated pyramid, or at least one portion of a sphere. 5. The device of claim 1, wherein a second pair of adjacent scintillators includes the third scintillator and the fourth scintillator, wherein the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators is adjacent to a first third scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and wherein the first scintillator shares a first detector of the at least one detector with the third scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 6. The device of claim 5, wherein the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators is adjacent to the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and wherein the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators shares a second detector of the at least one detector with the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 7. The device of claim 6, wherein the prismatoid is configured to redirect light from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators to at least one of the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators, the third scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, or the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 8. The device of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second scintillators comprises: a first interior side; and a second interior side substantially parallel with the first interior side. 9. The device of claim 8, wherein the first interior side and the second interior side of the first scintillator or the second scintillator are configured to reflect light therebetween, for transmitting substantially all of the light from the prismatoid to the at least one detector. 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the at least one detector comprises at least one pixilated sensor. 11. The device of claim 10, further comprising at least one processor configured to communicate with the at least one pixilated sensor to perform positron emission tomography (PET) by sensing at least one photon. 12. A prismatoid comprising: a transparent surface adjacent to a first pair of adjacent scintillators including a first scintillator and a second scintillator, and a second pair of adjacent scintillators including a third scintillator, and a fourth scintillator; and a reflective surface configured to redirect travel of at least one photon emitted from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators through the transparent surface, wherein the travel of the at least one photon is redirected from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators toward the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators. 13. The prismatoid of claim 12, wherein at least one detector is provided on an end of the first pair of adjacent scintillators, opposite the reflective surface, and wherein the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators shares a first detector of the at least one detector with the third scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 14. The prismatoid of claim 13, wherein the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators is adjacent to the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and wherein the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators shares a second detector of the at least one detector with the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 15. The prismatoid of claim 12, wherein the prismatoid is configured to redirect light from the first scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators to at least one of the second scintillator of the first pair of adjacent scintillators, the third scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators, and the fourth scintillator of the second pair of adjacent scintillators. 16. The prismatoid of claim 15, wherein each of the first and second scintillators comprises: a first interior side; and a second interior side substantially parallel with the first interior side, and wherein the first interior side and the second interior side of the first scintillator or the second scintillator are configured to reflect light therebetween, for transmitting substantially all of the light from the prismatoid to at least one detector. 17. The prismatoid of claim 12, wherein the prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one truncated pyramid, or at least one portion of a sphere. 18. A system for non-invasive medical imaging, the system comprising: at least one prismatoid; at least one detector; and a scintillator array comprising a first pair of adjacent scintillators including a first scintillator and a second scintillator, and a second pair of adjacent scintillators including a third scintillator, and a fourth scintillator, wherein the at least one prismatoid is configured to redirect light between the first or second pair of adjacent scintillators of the scintillator array, wherein the at least one detector is provided on an end of the scintillator array opposite the at least one prismatoid, and wherein the at least one prismatoid is substantially shaped as at least one of at least one prism, at least one antiprism, at least one frustum, at least one triangle, at least one cupola, at least one parallelepiped, at least one wedge, at least one pyramid, at least one truncated pyramid, or at least one portion of a sphere. 19. The system of claim 18, further comprising a processor configured to perform positron emission tomography (PET) with a single-sided depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout. 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the scintillator array, the at least one prismatoid, and the at least one detector are asymmetrically aligned, and wherein a first detector of the at least one detector abuts a second detector of the at least one detector, to extend an area for performing the PET. US17/417,552 -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guide Active -07-15 USB2 (en)Priority Applications (1)
Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title US17/417,552 USB2 (en) -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guideApplications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title USP -01-08 -01-08 USP -01-07 -01-07 PCT/US/ WOA1 (en) -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guide US17/417,552 USB2 (en) -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guideRelated Parent Applications (1)
Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date PCT/US/ A-371-Of-International WOA1 (en) -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guideRelated Child Applications (1)
Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date US18/528,304 Continuation USB2 (en) -01-08 -12-04 Prismatoid light guidePublications (2)
Publication Number Publication Date USA1 USA1 (en) -04-21 USB2 true USB2 (en) -12-12Family
ID=
Family Applications (2)
Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date US17/417,552 Active -07-15 USB2 (en) -01-08 -01-08 Prismatoid light guide US18/528,304 Active USB2 (en) -01-08 -12-04 Prismatoid light guideFamily Applications After (1)
Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date US18/528,304 Active USB2 (en) -01-08 -12-04 Prismatoid light guideCountry Status (7)
Country Link US (2) USB2 (en) EP (1) EPB1 (en) JP (2) JPA (en) KR (1) KRA (en) CN (1) CNB (en) CA (1) CAC (en) WO (1) WOA1 (en)Cited By (1)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title USA1 (en) * -10-07 -11-23 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method for power-efficient multiplexing for high resolution time-of-flight positron emission tomography modules with intercrystal light sharingFamilies Citing this family (4)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title CAC (en) -01-08 -03-05 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York Prismatoid light guide EPA4 (en) -02-15 -12-07 The Research Foundation for The State University of New York High resolution depth-encoding pet detector with prismatoid light guide array USB2 (en) -01-17 -02-04 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York High resolution and high sensitivity pet scanner with pet detector modules KRA (en) * -09-02 -06-02 더 리서치 파운데이션 포 더 스테이트 유니버시티 오브 뉴욕 Tapered scintillator determination module and method of use thereofCitations (85)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title USA (en) -09-25 -03-16 General Electric Company High energy radiation detector having improved reflective backing for phosphor layer DEA1 (en) -04-03 -10-11 Gen Electric RADIATION DETECTOR WITH A TRAPEZOIDAL SCINTILLATOR USA (en) -09-29 -07-19 National Institute Of Radiological Sciences Apparatus for detecting the location of incident radiation USA (en) -12-24 -11-15 General Electric Company Scintillation detector array employing zig-zag plates EPA2 (en) -12-15 -07-17 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. A radiation detector including a scintillator array JPHA (en) -09-23 -08-10 General Electric CoFamily Cites Families (49)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title JPSB1 (en) -10-17 -12-07 USA (en) * -04-22 -03-25 Atomic Energy Commission Two-dimensional readout system for radiation detector JPSU (en) -07-10 -01-27 JPSU (en) -06-15 -01-16 USA (en) -04-12 -05-29 Takaji Yamashita Position-sensitive radiation detector JPHU (en) -02-03 -08-20 株式会社アトリエエスキース Lap holder JPHA (en) -01-14 -08-02 Daifuku Co Ltd Take-in and out device with cab JPHA (en) -01-18 -08-05 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Method for preventing ic card from being misejected from ic card reader/writer USA1 (en) -06-19 -05-03 Ideas As Modular radiation detector with scintillators and semiconductor photodiodes and integrated readout and method for assembly thereof USB2 (en) -12-11 -12-11 General Electric Company Multi-layer reflector for CT detector PTB (en) -09-30 -08-24 Taguspark-Soc. Prom.Desenv.Parq.Ci.Tec.Area Lisboa POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY SYSTEM (PET) USB2 (en) -02-25 -07-06 Intramedical Imaging, Llc Positron emission detectors and configurations USB2 (en) -03-04 -05-27 General Electric Company Systems and methods to localize optical emission in radiation detectors USB2 (en) -03-04 -06-30 General Electric Company Systems and methods to localize optical emission in radiation detectors JPB2 (en) -05-19 -01-18 富士フイルム株式会社 Medical image part recognition device and medical image part recognition program USB2 (en) -07-03 -06-15 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing depth-of-interaction detection using positron emission tomography (PET) USB2 (en) -10-26 -06-07 Zecotek Imaging Systems Pte. Ltd Scintillation detector for positron emission tomography USA1 (en) -10-30 -03-22 Farhad Daghighian Portable pet scanner for imaging of a portion of the body JPB2 (en) -04-17 -02-20 株式会社島津製作所 Radiation detector and positron emission tomography apparatus including the same USB1 (en) -03-10 -12-27 Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc. Positron emission tomography with phoswich detector, systems and methods EPB1 (en) -07-30 -03-15 Pulsetor, LLC Electron detector including an intimately-coupled scintillator-photomultiplier combination, electron microscope employing the same and method of producing an image JPB2 (en) * -04-06 -04-30 富士フイルム株式会社 Radiation imaging apparatus and manufacturing method CNA (en) * -05-12 -01-15 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Optimized scintilator crystals for pet USB2 (en) -07-06 -11-24 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Positron emission tomography detector based on monolithic scintillator crystal RUA (en) -10-12 -11-20 Конинклейке Филипс Н.В. MODELING OF ARRAYS OF TIME-SPAN DETECTORS WITH CODING DEPTH OF INTERACTION JPB2 (en) * -12-28 -06-07 学校法人早稲田大学 Radiation detector FRB1 (en) -09-06 -10-09 Commissariat Energie Atomique SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING NEUTRON, GAMMA AND MUON RADIATION WITH CONTIGUOUS PLASTIC SCINTILLATORS WOA1 (en) -02-26 -09-03 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Scintillator array and methods of forming a scintillator array and a radiation detector WOA1 (en) -02-27 -09-03 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Scintillator stack, device including the scintillator stack, and method for making the scintillator stack USB2 (en) -05-15 -08-23 Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation Scintillation detector for improved PET performance WOA1 (en) -06-13 -12-17 Tty-Säätiö A detector for positron emission tomography JPA (en) * -10-23 -12-21 ペットシス、エレクトロニクス、メディカル、ペット、ディテクターズ、ソシエダーデ、アノニマPetsys Electronics, Medical Pet Detectors, Sa Detector component for X-ray or gamma-ray detector WOA1 (en) -05-01 -11-10 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Apparatus and methods for depth-of-interaction positron tomography detector using dichotomous sensing JPB2 (en) -09-18 -09-30 株式会社東芝 Scintillator array for neutron detection and neutron detection method WOA1 (en) -01-05 -07-13 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Apparatus and methods for optical emission detection GBD0 (en) -03-24 -05-11 Inst Of Food Res S-methylcysteine sulfoxide for prostate cancer treatment USB1 (en) -06-16 -02-21 FMI Medical Systems Co., Ltd. Optical channel reduction method and apparatus for photodetector arrays USB2 (en) -10-28 -11-21 Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona Scintillation detector based systems and methods for using the same EPA1 (en) -09-25 -04-01 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Scintillator array with high detective quantum efficiency CNB (en) -03-29 -11-28 深圳帧观德芯科技有限公司 Radiation detector with scintillator CNB (en) -07-19 -10-31 沈阳智核医疗科技有限公司 Detection unit for a PET detector and PET detector USB2 (en) -01-17 -02-04 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York High resolution and high sensitivity pet scanner with pet detector modules WOA1 (en) -02-24 -09-02 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York High resolution and high sensitivity pet scanner with prism-pet detector modules USB2 (en) -04-22 -03-15 GE Precision Healthcare LLC Systems and methods for scintillators having reflective inserts KRA (en) * -09-02 -06-02 더 리서치 파운데이션 포 더 스테이트 유니버시티 오브 뉴욕 Tapered scintillator determination module and method of use thereof USA1 (en) -09-03 -11-09 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method for crystal-to-channel coupling WOA1 (en) -10-07 -04-14 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method for power-efficient multiplexing for high resolution time-of-flight positron emission tomography modules with intercrystal light sharing USB2 (en) -10-07 -06-18 Cintilight, Llc Lateral crystal photodiode readouts and switched diode networks for processing nuclear events WOA1 (en) -04-21 -10-24 Cornell University Detector block for tomography scanners-
- -01-08 CA CAA patent/CAC/en active Active
- -01-08 KR KRA patent/KRA/en active Pending
- -01-08 JP JPA patent/JPA/en active Pending
- -01-08 WO PCT/US/ patent/WOA1/en unknown
- -01-08 US US17/417,552 patent/USB2/en active Active
- -01-08 CN CN.0A patent/CNB/en active Active
- -01-08 EP EP.0A patent/EPB1/en active Active
-
- -12-04 US US18/528,304 patent/USB2/en active Active
-
- -08-13 JP JPA patent/JPA/en active Pending
Patent Citations (90)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title USA (en) -09-25 -03-16 General Electric Company High energy radiation detector having improved reflective backing for phosphor layer DEA1 (en) -04-03 -10-11 Gen Electric RADIATION DETECTOR WITH A TRAPEZOIDAL SCINTILLATOR USA (en) -09-29 -07-19 National Institute Of Radiological Sciences Apparatus for detecting the location of incident radiation USA (en) -12-24 -11-15 General Electric Company Scintillation detector array employing zig-zag plates EPA2 (en) -12-15 -07-17 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. A radiation detector including a scintillator array JPHA (en) -09-23 -08-10 General Electric CoNon-Patent Citations (17)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Title E. Berg, PhD et al., "Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography", © Elsevier Inc., pp. 311-331. European Search Report dated Jul. 15, issued in counterpart Application No. .0, 8 pages. G. Stringhini et al., "Development and evaluation of a practical method to measure the Depth of Interaction function for a single side readout PET detector", . . . JINST 11 P, pp. 15. H. Uchida et al., "A novel single-ended readout depth of interaction PET detector fabricated using sub-surface laser engraving", Phys. Med. Biol. 61 , pp. 17. J. Kang et al., "Simulation study of PET detector configuration with thick light guide and GAPD array having large-area microcells for high effective quantum efficiency" . . . Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 131 () 79-87, © Elsevier Ireland Ltd., pp. 9. L. Bläckberg et al., "Light Spread Manipulation in Scintillators Using Laser Induced Optical Barriers", IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, . . . vol. 65, No. 8, Aug. , pp. 8. L. Bläckberg et al., "Simulation study of light transport in laser-processed LYSO: Ce detectors with single-side readout", Phys. Med. Biol. 62 , pp. 23. M. Pizzichemi et al., "A new method for depth of interaction determination in PET detectors", Phys. Med. Biol. 61 , pp. 21. Makek, Mihael et al., "Scintillator Pixel Detectors for Measurement of Compton Scattering", Condensed Matter, Feb. 15, , pp. 13. Marcinkowski, R. et al., "Optimized light sharing for high-resolution Tof Pet detector based on digital silicon photomultipliers", Phys. Med. Biol. 59 () -. N. Inadama et al., "DOI PET Detectors with Scintillation Crystals Cut as Triangular Prisms", IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, © IEEE, pp. -. PCT/ISA/210 Search Report issued on PCT/US/, dated May 6, , pp. 7. PCT/ISA/237 Written Opinion issued on PCT/US/, dated May 6, , pp. 3. S. Cuddy et al., "Effect of scintillator crystal geometry and surface finishing on depth of interaction resolution in PET detectors: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental . . . Results using silicon photomultipliers", Proc. SPIE , Medical Imaging : Physics of Medical Imaging, O (Mar. 22, ), pp. 9. Schmitz, Ruth E. et al., "The Physics of PET/CT scanners", Physics, , pp. 16. Song, Tae Yong et al., "A sub-millimeter resolution PET detector module using a multi-pixel photon counter array", Phys. Med. Biol. 55 () -. Y. Shao et al., "Development of a prototype PET scanner with depth-of-interaction measurement using solid-state photomultiplier arrays and parallel readout electronics" . . . Phys. Med. Biol. 59 , pp. 17.Cited By (1)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title USA1 (en) * -10-07 -11-23 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York System and method for power-efficient multiplexing for high resolution time-of-flight positron emission tomography modules with intercrystal light sharingAlso Published As
Publication number Publication date CAA1 (en) -07-16 KRA (en) -08-20 CAC (en) -03-05 CNB (en) -09-24 EPA1 (en) -11-17 EPC0 (en) -03-05 USA1 (en) -04-11 WOA1 (en) -07-16 EPB1 (en) -03-05 JPA (en) -02-25 USB2 (en) -04-15 CNA (en) -08-13 JPA (en) -12-03 EPA4 (en) -08-17 USA1 (en) -04-21Similar Documents
Publication Publication Date Title USB2 (en) -04-15 Prismatoid light guide USB2 (en) -11-05 Apparatus and methods for depth-of-interaction positron tomography detector using dichotomous sensing EPB1 (en) -09-11 Modelling of tof-doi detector arrays USB2 (en) -05-02 System and method for detecting gamma radiation, such as a gamma camera USB2 (en) -11-29 Radiation detector and tomographic equipment provided with the same USB2 (en) -04-05 Scintillation detector with active light guide USA1 (en) -01-21 Novel scintillation detector array and associate signal processing method for gamma ray detection with encoding the energy, position, and time coordinaties of the interaction WOA9 (en) -09-10 High resolution depth-encoding pet detector with prismatoid light guide array JPA (en) -03-12 Radiation position detector JPA (en) -12-09 Three-dimensional radiation position detector CNB (en) -07-04 Multi-gamma photon coincidence imaging system and method based on slit-hole mixed collimator USB2 (en) -04-03 Layered three-dimensional radiation position detector CNB (en) -11-05 Light guide and PET (Photomultiplier Tube) detection system applying same USB2 (en) -10-19 Crystal array, detector, medical detection device and method of manufacturing crystal array Ghelman et al. Wide Energetic Response of 4π Directional Gamma Detector Based on Combination of Compton Scattering and Photoelectric Effect KRB1 (en) -08-08 Radiation detector of position emission tomography having optimized detecting module CNA (en) -05-02 Detector module for an emission imaging device and emission imaging device WOA1 (en) -07-29 Device for the detection of gamma rays with interaction depth and time-of-flight encodingLegal Events
Date Code Title Description -06-23 FEPP Fee payment procedureFree format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY
-07-02 FEPP Fee payment procedureFree format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY
-01-25 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION
-04-10 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED
-07-28 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS
-08-07 AS AssignmentOwner name: THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GOLDAN, AMIRHOSSEIN;LABELLA, ANDREW;ZHAO, WEI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM TO ;REEL/FRAME:/
-09-15 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION
-09-22 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS
-10-06 STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in generalFree format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED
-11-22 STCF Information on status: patent grantFree format text: PATENTED CASE
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Light Guide For Scintillator Array. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
Comments